MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6893295121 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15218351

Empis (Enoplempis) sagehenensis Sinclair, Brooks & Cumming, 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· en· W6893295121 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaHolotypeScutellumFemurDorsumThorax (insect anatomy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Empis (Enoplempis) sagehenensis sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 741D7BD8-7709-4D4A-8B10-4C3B6A0D8189 (Figs 112–114, 119, 130) Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂, labelled: “ Sagehen Creek / nr. Hobart Mills [39°24′N 120°11′W]/ Nevada Co. Cal. / VII-1-1964 ”; “ M. E. Irwin / Collector”; “ HOLOTYPE / Empis (Enoplempis) / sagehenensis Sinclair,/ Brooks & Cumming [red label]” (UCRC). PARATYPES: USA. California: Same data as holotype except, 15.vii.1964 (1♀, UCRC); same data except, 17.vi.1964, R. M. Bohart (1♂, UCDC); same data except, 7.vii.1964, MT in meadow (1♂, UCRC). Diagnosis. This species is distinguished from other species of the E. (En.) canaster species group by two paint brush-like preapical ventral lobes on the male hind femur and posteroventral process with posterior forked lobe, three digitiform basal processes of the male hind tibia, including a short lobe with long, wavy cluster of setae, and length of the dorsal setae on the male hind tibia less than twice width of tibia (Figs 112–114). Description. Wing length 5.6–7.0 mm. Male. Similar to E. (En.) canaster, except as follows: head with ocellar setae parallel, shorter than ocellar triangle; postocular setae with upper 2–3 setae strong, subequal in length to ocellar setae, with lower postocular setae thinner. Thorax with postpronotum with 1–2 short setae and several shorter, dark stiff setulae. Scutum with short, fine uniserial acr; dc uniserial; 1 posterior npl, with 1 shorter anterior npl; 1 presut spal; 1 psut spal; 1–2 pal. Scutellum with 1 widely separated pair of very short sctl, aligned with dc row, with 1 outer, shorter pair of marginal setulae. Laterotergite with 2 stiff, dark setae. Legs slender, yellow, tarsi darker; coxae yellowish, thinly clothed in greyish pruinescence. Fore tarsomere 1 somewhat swollen, slightly narrower than apex of tibia. Hind femur with 2 preapical, paint brush-like ventral processes and outer posteroventral digitiform process without setae, divided into inner finger-like lobe and broad outer forked lobe; medial paint brush-like process narrow, without base; outer paint brush-like process with setae grouped into finger-like, divergent clusters; short knob-like posteroventral process distal to forked lobe; apex of femur without preapical row of posterior setae; preapical anterior seta strong, shorter than width of femur (Figs 113, 114). Hind tibia with three posteroventral digitiform processes on basal quarter; anteroventral lobe digitiform with long, black inner and outer marginal setae, with few apical setae; posteroventrally with upper hooked lobe with short, strong apical setae; lower posteroventral lobe short with long, wavy cluster of black setae extending beyond upper lobe; seta in posteroapical comb; apical half with long dorsal setae, longer apically, less than twice width of tibia (Figs 112–114). Hind tarsomere 1 weakly inflated, with long dorsal setae, similar to tibia; tarsomeres 2–5 similar to mid tarsus. Halter yellowish. Terminalia (Fig. 119): orange brown, shiny with cercus dark brown. Cercus short, rectangular; dorsal margin slightly sinuous; apex rounded with lower corner distinctly prolonged; setae longer than width of cercus; weakly fused anteriorly to epandrium. Subepandrium without process; with row of medium-length setae. Epandrial lamella oval, higher than long; posterior margin without projection, setae shorter than half length of epandrium. Hypandrium long, projecting, with arched apical margin; without setae. Phallus very narrow and tubular basally; gradually expanded on basal half, tapered, gradually arched apically; apex emerging beyond cercus; apex not expanded; ejaculatory apodeme longer than length of epandrium, T-shaped, with ventrally positioned lateral apodemes. Female. Similar to male, except as follows: frons broader, nearly as wide as ocellar triangle; hindleg without modified setae and processes; abdomen yellow, with pleural membrane enlarged; tergites 7 and 8 shiny. Geographical distribution and seasonal occurrence (Fig. 130). Empis (En.) sagehenensis sp. nov. is only known from Sagehen Creek in Nevada County, California. Adults have been collected in June and July. Etymology. This species is named after the type locality, Sagehen Creek in Nevada County, California. Nuptial gift presentation. Form unknown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→