MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893313611 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15527060

Intelligent Scaffolds for Advanced Bone Regeneration

2025· book· en· W6893313611 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScaffoldRegeneration (biology)Tissue engineeringResource (disambiguation)NanocompositeQuality (philosophy)Bone healing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Copyright © 2025 A9.com LLC or its affiliates. Published Heritage Branch, Library and Archives Canada. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations used in critical reviews or scholarly articles.This book is a work of academic and scientific research for Doctoral thesis as Development and Optimization of a Chitosan-Based Nanocomposite Scaffold with Magnesium-Doped Hydroxyapatite and Bioactive Agents for Enhanced Bone Augmentation. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information presented herein, the authors and publisher accept no responsibility for any errors or omissions or for any consequences arising from the use of this material.Bone tissue engineering (BTE) integrates materials science, cellular biology, and biomedical engineering to address the challenges of regenerating bone in critical-sized defects caused by trauma, disease, or surgical resection. Traditional bone grafts face limitations such as donor site morbidity and insufficient vascularization, necessitating advanced biomimetic solutions. This research introduces a novel chitosan-based nanocomposite scaffold doped with magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite (Mg-HA) and enhanced with bioactive agents—Icariin, Lithium Chloride, and Naringin—to improve bone augmentation. The scaffold aims to mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM) of bone, providing mechanical support, osteoinductivity, osteoconductivity, and vascularization. By leveraging advanced fabrication techniques and proposing targeted enhancements, this study seeks to increase the quality and quantity of regenerated bone, offering a sustainable alternative to conventional grafts. The research will validate the scaffold’s efficacy through in vitro and in vivo studies, with the ultimate goal of advancing clinical translation for maxillofacial and orthopedic applications. The primary aim of this research is to develop and optimize a chitosan-based nanocomposite scaffold incorporating magnesium-doped hydroxyapatite (Mg-HA) and bioactive molecules (Icariin, Lithium Chloride, and Naringin) to enhance bone augmentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsFrench-language works237,207