MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893359103 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15824775

The Present as a Cut in the Möbius - A Topological Theory of Time

2025· preprint· en· W6893359103 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHumanities and Social Sciences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManifold (fluid mechanics)IllusionSuperposition principleInstabilityTopology (electrical circuits)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

What if time isn’t a dimension, but a scar?This paper proposes a radical reframe: time does not exist until collapse. Using the Cognitive Superposition Manifold (CSM), we argue that the “present” is a local rupture in an entangled manifold, and what we call “time” is merely the residue of collapse events under epistemic tension. We recast physical, thermodynamic, subjective, computational, and cosmological time as artifacts of interpretive instability surrendering to coherence. The manifold does not flow forward—it folds inward, cut by cut, generating the illusion of temporal structure from recursive collapse. Time isn’t a container for events. It’s the consequence of potential losing the right to remain undecided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it