Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pterogrammoides indicus Papp, 1989 Pterogrammoides indica Papp, 1989: 330. Pterogrammoides indicus – Roháček et al. 2001: 216. Type material Holotype INDIA – Meghalaya • ♂; Garo Hills, Rongrengiri; 400 m a.s.l.; 3 Nov. 1978; C. Besuchet and I. Löbl leg.; "tamisage en forêt, au pied de grands arbres”; HNHM. Paratype INDIA – West Bengal • 1 ♂; Darjeeling District, Sukna; 200 m a.s.l.; 7 Oct. 1978; C. Besuchet and I. Löbl leg.; "tamisage en forêt”; HNHM. Material examined Paratype photo provided by Petra Szöllősi-Tóth, HNHM. Distribution Indomalayan: India (Papp 1989). Remarks Pterogrammoides indicus is almost identical to Pt. thaii but apparently has a slightly smaller S6+7 (1.3 × epandrial width) and a more J-shaped (bent in the apical third) postgonite. Papp’s (1989) description and illustrations of Pt. indicus differ from Pt. thaii only in slight colour differences, slightly thinner legs, shorter wings, and apparently smaller overall genitalia. See comments under the latter species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".