MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6893369773 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15995602

Trypophloeus punctipennis Hopkins 1915

2021· article· en· W6893369773 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHost (biology)Type (biology)Betulaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trypophloeus punctipennis Hopkins, 1915 Holotype: ♀, //Alta 30.6. Ut.// 7599 e [in blue ink] Hopk W. Va [in black ink]// Det. Type [in blue ink] No. Hopk. 3-1-02// Leg. Mounted [on blue paper]// Trypophloeus punctipennis Hopk. [in black ink]// punctipennis H.3 [in black pencil] Glyptoderes punctatus n.sp. [in blue ink] Hopk. [on reverse side]// Glyptoderes punctipennis Hopk. [in black ink] Hopk. [printed]// // red rectangle Typ No. 7399, USNM. Trypophloeus nitidus Swaine, 1912 res. n. Additional material. CANADA: 5 exx. 1930 Karl Schedl 737, NHMW; 4 exx. 1930 Karl Schedl 759, NHMW; Ontario: 4 exx. Biscotasing, Alnus incana, 10. V.1930, K.E. Schedl leg/det, NHMW; Yukon Territory: 5 exx. Elliot Lake, Salix, 25.IX.1987, M.M. Furniss leg., BEM; USA, Alaska: 6 exx. Cantwell, Salix, 29.VII.1967, M.M. Furniss leg./det., BEM; 13 exx. 21 miles E of Cantwell, Salix, 30.VIII.1967, M.M. Furniss leg./ S.L. Wood det., BEM; 12 exx. Kongakut Riv., Brooks Range, Salix, 26.VIII.1974, M.M. Furniss leg./ S.L. Wood det., BEM; 3 exx. Shublik Springs. Cunning River, Host Salix sp., 8.X.1976, M.M. Furniss leg., TAMU; 10 exx. Mount. Mc. Kinley N.P., Igloo camp, Salix, 29. V.1977, M.M. Furniss leg./det., BEM; 4 exx. Fairbanks, Salix, 30.VIII.1977, L.Bordelon leg./ M.M. Furniss det., BEM; USA, Utah: 2 exx. S36 T 12 NR2E, Logan Сanyon., el. 7,000 Ft. Salix scouleriana, 17.VII.1946, S.L.Wood leg., SEM; 1 ex. Little Bery, Logan Canyon., el. 8,000 Ft., Salix scouleriana 17. V.1947, S.L. Wood leg., SEM; 1 ex. Logan Canyon, Salix scouleriana, 28. V.1949, S.L.Wood, SEM; USA, Idaho: 10 exx. Coeur d’Alene Alnus sp., 4.XII.1916 Evenden JC Colr., BEM; 2 ex. Poison Creek, 20 mi SW Grandview, Salix 31.VII.1967, M.M. Furniss leg., D.M. Anderson det., BEM; USA, Oregon: 15 exx. Hot Springs C.G. Hart Mtn. Refuge, Lake Co. Salix scouleriana 14.VIII.1990 M.M. Furniss, J.B. Johnson leg, M.M. Furniss det., BEM Trypophloeus nitidus Swaine, 1912: 349 = T. striatulus auct., nec Mannerheim, 1853: 235 syn. n. = T. punctipennis Hopkins, 1915: 37 Examined material. Type material: Holotype: Trypophloeus striatulus (Mannerheim, 1853): circle of golden paper // “ Cryphalus striatulus Mnnhm (=Mannerheim), Kenai J.” farther unreadable in ink handwriting, probably “Russam”, ZIN. Comment. The type of the species has been considered lost, at least not found in Mannerheim collection, Finland (Wood and Bright 1992). However, in 1853 both Alaska and Finland were still parts of Russian Empire and thus deposition of the holotype in main country collection, i.e. in the former capital of the Empire (St. Petersburg) was logical. Cryphalus striatulus is the original valid name proposed by Mannerheim for a new species. It was described and really belongs to genus Cryphalus and not to genus Trypophloeus as many authors thought. It is not a new synonym, but a senior name and Cryphalus ruficollis is a new junior synonym of Cryphalus striatulus. Trypophloeus nitidus Swaine, 1912: Lectotype: ♀, 172 [in red ink on small rectangle]// Weymouth NS [in red ink] LECTOTYPE [in black ink, printed] CNC No 9276// Trypophloeus nitidus Sw. [handwritten in black ink], female, CNCI; Paratype (Paralectotype) 1 ex., Cornell U., No. 292.2// Trypophloeus nitidus SW. //on Alnus G.E. Sanders // Weymouth 1912 – n.8, NHMW; 1 ex., 2476// [silver rectangular piece of paper]// Cryphalus nitidus Swaine Type series S.L. Wood (19)56// Trypophloeus nitidus Sokanovský det., ZMMU. General distribution. North America, including Canada (Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Quebec, Yukon), Alaska and mountains of western USA (Colorado, Idaho, Minnesota, Oregon, Utah) (Wood and Bright, 1992). Comment. We were not able to find the reference indicating the introduction of the species to Hungary (cf. Knížek, 2011). Host trees. Alnus crispa, A. rugosa, Salix scouleriana, S. alaxensis. Re-descripion. Body: length 1.6–2.2 mm, 2.7 (2.4–3.0) times as long as wide, black or dark brown, brightly shining. Head: frons convex, with Y-shaped impression from upper level of eyes to antennal insertions; surface finely reticulated from upper level of eyes to vertex, shallowly punctured below; pubescence consisting of inconspicuous sparse hairs. Pronotum: widest at base, distinctly transverse, 0.65–0.75 as long as wide; summit slightly behind middle; asperities in front of summit, rather large and abundant, forming concentric rows in anterior half; anterior margin with four to eight contiguous teeth. Surface of lateral and posterior areas shining, punctures rather close, coarse and deep; covered with short hair-like setae, slightly longer ispiratete area. Elytra: glossy, 1.6–2.0 times as long as wide; punctures on striae and interstriae deeply impressed in anterior two thirds, becoming smaller and shallow near declivity; interstriae with small granules on declivity; surface covered with recumbent hair-like strial and interstrial setae, becoming more scale-like at the declivity, and with rows of erect elongated scales on interstriae throughout elytral length. Diagnosis. Distinguished from other species due to reticulated surface of the upper portion of frons and vertex; from T. alni and T. dejevi by more weak punctures in basal half of pronotum and declivity, by elytral vestiture, and by brightly shining body. T. nitidus differs from the North American species T. populi, T. salicis, and T. thatcheri by strong pucturation of elytra organized in rows. These rows of punctures on elytra extending at least two-thirds from the elytral base to declivity. The scale-like pubescence is only present at the declivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior→French-language works237,207→