MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893370708 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15633730

Mycale (Mycale) loveni

2023· article· en· W6893370708 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMarine Sponges and Natural Products
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpen waterTable (database)SpongeFlakePoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mycale (Mycale) loveni (Fristedt, 1887) (Figs. 2 and 3 and Table 1) SYNONYMS: Clathria loveni Fristedt, 1887, Esperella bellabellensis Lambe, 1905, Esperella fisheri de Laubenfels, 1926, Esperia loveni (Fristedt, 1887), Myclae (Carmia) bellabellensis (Lambe, 1905), Mycale bellabellensis (Lambe, 1905), Mycale fisheri (de Laubenfels, 1926), and Mycale loveni (Fristedt, 1887). DIAGNOSIS: Stalked sponge with a cavernous funnel- or tubeshaped body, though specimens may be highly polymorphic and attain massive forms. Sponge body varies in size from a few centimetres in length to over one metre in funnel-shaped specimens. Generally found in deep water (> 200 m), though the holotype (22 m) and other specimens have been collected in shallow water (Fristedt 1887). The sponge body varies in size from a few centimetres in length to over one metre in funnel-shaped specimens. MATERIALS EXAMINED: Mycale cf. bellabellensis (Lambe, 1905), RBCM 978-00084 - 002, Edge of Clayoquot Canyon, British Columbia, Canada, 48.955 ◦ N, 126.415 ◦ W, 201 m depth, collected by PBS/JAT, 26 May 1962. Mycale (Mycale) loveni (Fristedt, 1887), RBCM 003-00036 - 002, off southern Alaska, USA, 55.883 ◦ N, 153.75 ◦ W, 228 m depth, collected by PBS, 1963. Mycale (Mycale) loveni (Fristedt, 1887), RBCM 009-00134 - 005, Dixon Entrance, British Columbia, Canada, 54.45 ◦ N, 131.7 ◦ W, collected by Pacific Biological Station (PBS), 12 August 1965. Mycale (Mycale) loveni (Fristedt, 1887), NA086-086-03, West of Olympic Peninsula, Washington, USA, 48.2503 ◦ N, 125.0129 ◦ W, 257 m depth, collected by NOAA, 26 August 2017. Mycale (Mycale) loveni (Fristedt, 1887), NA086-102, West of Olympic Peninsula, Washington, USA, 48.129 ◦ N, 125.084 ◦ W, 276 m depth, collected by NOAA, 28 August 2017. Mycale (Mycale) loveni (Fristedt, 1887), NA086-103-01, West of Olympic Peninsula, Washington, USA, 48.129 ◦ N, 125.084 ◦ W, 276 m depth, collected by NOAA, 28 August 2017. Mycale (Mycale) loveni (Fristedt, 1887), SH1812-039, Daisy Bank, off Salem Oregon USA, 44.665 ◦ N, 124.809 ◦ W, 342 m depth, collected by NOAA, 15 October 2018. Mycale (Mycale) loveni (Fristedt, 1887), SH1812-091, Mendocino Ridge, northern California, USA, 40.2873 ◦ N, 124.6901 ◦ W, 364 m depth, collected by NOAA, 20 October 2018. Mycale (Mycale) loveni (Fristedt, 1887), SH1812-190, Santa Lucia Bank, central California, USA, 34.679 ◦ N, 121.172 ◦ W, 549 m depth, collected by NOAA, 1 November 2018. Mycale (Mycale) loveni (Fristedt, 1887), SH1812-245, Sverdrup Bank, southern California, USA, 33.140 ◦ N, 120.356 ◦ W, 263 m depth, collected by NOAA, 6 November 2018. Mycale (Mycale) loveni (Fristedt, 1887), RL1905-069B, Wind Farm West, central California, USA, 35.062 ◦ N, 121.532 ◦ W, 706 m depth, collected by NOAA, 30 October 2019. Mycale (Mycale) loveni (Fristedt, 1887), NA121-057B, Quinault Canyon, WA, USA, 47.2179 ◦ N, 124.9047 ◦ W, 325 m depth, collected by NOAA, 27 September 2020. Mycale (Mycale) loveni (Fristedt, 1887), NA121-145B, Grays Canyon, Washington, USA, 46.9137 ◦ N, 124.8914 ◦ W, 294 m depth, collected by NOAA, 1 October 2020. COMPARATIVE MATERIAL EXAMINED: Syntype: Esperella bellabellensis Lambe, 1905, CMNI 1994-0038 / CMNI 1994-0039, off Bella Bella, Campbell Island, British Columbia, Canada, 52.17 ◦ N, 128.17 ◦ W, 549 m, collected by F. Landsberg, 1904. EXTERNAL APPEARANCE (Figs. 2A, 2B, 2D, 3A, 3B, and 3C): The external morphology of Mycale (Mycale) loveni is variable. Most authors report M. (M.) loveni as being stalked, though some Gulf of Alaska specimens were reported as massive (Stone et al. 2011). Fristedt’s (1887) original description from the Chukchi Sea depicts branching, thickly stalked specimens where lateral branches form subquadrangular cells filled with softer macerated tissue. Koltun (1959) reported Russian specimens (Chukchi, Bering, and Okhotsk Seas) with broad funnel-shaped stalks, though some specimens lack the large funnel. The surface is rough and may be grooved or microhispid. The colour while alive is greenish yellow to light yellow to brown. Consistency is somewhat compressible; it is not easily torn across spicule tracts, but smaller spicule tracts can be teased apart. Sponge tissue is easily removed from between the thick skeletal fibres and may be absent upon collection. Table 1 lists the outer morphologies that were examined and those from literature sources. SKELETON (Fig. 2C): The choanosome is composed of branching and anastomosing thick, multispicular tracts composed of styles echinated at varying intervals by loose styles. Between these thick tracts, secondary tracts form polygonal reticulations 1200–1600 µm across, often partly infilled with style brushes. Anisochelae are concentrated on the surface of spicule tracts and scattered throughout. Spicule tracts expand into plumes at the surface, and spicules protrude 100– 200 µm beyond the surface singly or in groups. At the surface, tangential tracts of styles cross-connect these plumes, forming a polygonal reticulation with meshes highly variable in shape and dimension, from 300 to 1200 µm in diameter. Large anisochelae form rosettes that occur sparingly in the ectosome and choanosome. Single large and small anisochelae are scattered throughout the sponge and are concentrated in the outer tissue layer that covers living specimens.Funnel Bering Strait, Eastern Aleutians – 350–465 72–100 35 – Note: n = 30 measurements of individual spicules unless otherwise noted. ∗ From literature sources. SPICULES (Figs. 2E–2L and 3D–3K and Table 1): From examined specimens, the spicule complement consists of styles as megascleres and anisochelae microscleres, usually clearly divisible into three size classes, each with somewhat different morphologies. Measurements from CMNI 1994-0038: Styles: 425– 456 –496 × 11– 13 –15.5 µm. Straight, sharp points may be lanceolate or mucronate. Styles either lack the constriction in the shaft just below the head found in most Mycale species (mycalostyles) or the constriction is slight. Large anisochelae: 83– 88 –94 µm. Frontal alae are narrow, and slightly rounded. The free portion of the shaft is approximately 1/4 of the total spicule length. Rosettes are variably present and scattered throughout the sponge. Medium anisochelae: 43– 54 –67 µm. Slight variations in shape are noted between a likely fan-shaped fragment (RBCM 003-00036-002, Figs. 2I and 2J) and a club-shaped specimen (RBCM 978-00084-002; Figs. 3H and 3I), where the alae are stouter in the club-shaped specimen. However, this variation is only visible at high magnification and may not be consistent between the two morphotypes. Small anisochelae: 19– 22 –25 µm. Elongated. In some spicules, there is a miniscule median tooth-like extension arising from the lower alae along the upper rim, but most often this upper rim is flat. GENETIC DATA: D13–E13 domains of 28S and ITS gene fragments were obtained from Pacific Mycale (Mycale) loveni specimens. Only about 40 bp overlapped in M. (M.) loveni ITS sequences due to low sequence quality from stutter artifacts following three successive homopolymer repeats greater than 9 bp in length (Fazekas et al. 2010). Maximum likelihood trees comparing available Mycale ITS and D13–E 13 28S sequences resulted in a monophyletic clade for M. (M.) loveni (Figs. 4 and 5). COI sequences for M. (M.) loveni were only obtained in one direction, so consensus sequences were not created; however, most of the top nucleotide BLAST search results for the single direction reads were members of the genus Mycale. DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY: Mycale (Mycale) loveni has a very wide distribution range that spans the Arctic and North Pacific oceans. The holotype originates from the Chukchi Sea (Fig. 1A), with records also identified from the Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, Gulf of Alaska, and British Columbia, between 22 and 800 m depth. Records from NOAA’s national database for deep-sea corals and sponges (Hourigan et al. 2015) show M. (M.) loveni to be particularly common around the Aleutian Islands and the Gulf of Alaska, which reflects the historical sampling intensity in this region. There are also sparse records as far south as California, within the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (Hourigan et al. 2015). From ROV observations off British Columbia, Canada, in situ sponges were commonly attached to hard substratum ranging in size from small cobbles to exposed bedrock. The usual stalked morphology of M. (M.) loveni may allow this species to inhabit areas inimical to sponge growth once the larvae successfully settle. Mycale (Mycale) loveni was observed to be a common, large, habitat-forming demosponge at Learmonth Bank, Dixon Entrance in sites that were dominated by the abundance of several large glass sponge species, notably Farrea sp., Aphrocallistes vastus (Schulze, 1886) and Heterochone calyx (Schulze, 1886) (Chu 2010). Other fauna co-occurring with M. (M.) loveni include Sebastes spp. rockfish, alcyonacean corals such as Primnoa pacifica Kinoshita, 1907, cup corals, other small corals, crinoids, anemones, holothurians, brachiopods, and sponges (Chu 2010). REMARKS: The specimens analyzed here are consistent with Fristedt’s (1887) original description of C. loveni. Fristedt described an erect and irregularly ramous specimen with several slender branches issuing from a firm stalk, and the branches form a mesh that is filled with softer tissue. The styles of this species were described to be thickest near the pointed end, and this holds true for most of the examined specimens; however, the more hastate spicules as described by Koltun (1959) are not present in all specimens. Here we also suggest that the species has three size categories of anisochelae rather than two. This is contrary to Fristedt’s original description, which does not mention a small size category, while de Laubenfels (1932) reported four size categories for large specimens that he considered as Mycale bellabellensis. In most specimens, the separation of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMarine Sponges and Natural ProductsFrench-language works237,207