Dolichogenidea jaimelewisi Fernandez-Triana & Boudreault 2025, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dolichogenidea jaimelewisi Fernandez-Triana & Boudreault sp. nov. Figs 68 A – F, 69 A-F Type material. Holotype. Costa Rica • Female, CNC; Guanacaste, Area de Conservación Guanacaste, Sector Cacao, Sendero Nayo; 10.92446, -85.46953; 1,090 m; 13.viii.2010; Manuel Pereira leg.; Host: Herpetogramma Dapkey 27; Voucher code: DHJPAR 0040384; Host voucher code: 10-SRNP-35722. Paratypes. Costa Rica • 2 Females, CNC; DHJPAR 0031233, DHJPAR 0040398. Diagnostic description. Anteromesoscutum punctures near end of notauli fused, unlike punctures on rest of anteromesoscutum; T 1 mostly parallel-sided but posterior 0.3 slightly narrowing towards posterior margin; T 1 mostly sculptured on posterior 0.5; T 2 smooth; T 2 transverse and comparatively narrow, its width at posterior margin> 3.0 × its length medially; scape ventrally yellow-brown, distinctly paler colored than dorsal side; tegula brown, same color than humeral complex; pro- and mesocoxae partially pale brown partially yellow; metacoxa mostly dark brown to black but with posterior 0.1–0.2 yellow; metafemur yellow; metatibia mostly yellow, with posterior 0.1–0.2 brown; body length: 2.81–2.88 mm; fore wing length: 2.94–3.03 mm. Among all species with T 2 smooth and dark coxae Dolichogenidea jaimelewisi can be distinguished by T 1 sculpture, T 2 shape, anteromesoscutum punctures, and scape, tegula and leg color. Another species, D. juanmatai, is similar morphologically but has different coloration of scape, tegula and legs, as well as different puncture sculpture on anteromesoscutum. Distribution. Costa Rica. Biology. Gregarious. Crambidae: Herpetogramma salbialis, Herpetogramma Dapkey 27, unidentified lepidopteran with provisional name ‘ spiloBioLep 01 BioLep 617 ’. DNA barcoding data. BIN BOLD: AAM 5738 (6 sequences, 6 barcode compliant). Etymology. Named in honor of Mr. Jaime Lewis of San Jose, and a volunteer taxonomist for Hemiptera in the Costa Rican National Museum, BioAlfa and the former INBio (Instituto Nacional de Biodiversity) in recognition of his decade dedicated to the biodiversity understanding of the Hemiptera of Costa Rica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".