MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893407171 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16815812

DEPRECATED: Matcher (Version 1) for Automated Task Alignment in the Genomic API for Model Evaluation (GAME)

2025· other· en· W6893407171 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTask (project management)Container (type theory)Python (programming language)Transcription (linguistics)Matching (statistics)Ontology alignmentKey (lock)Graph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This record provides a Matcher container that runs an automated task alignment service powered by a local LLM using Ollama, to perform semantic ontology matching. It bundles the gemma3:12b model and all necessary Python dependencies to map fuzzy, free-text user inputs to canonical terms from a controlled vocabulary. It operates as a standalone TCP server, accepting JSON-formatted requests and returning the best-matched term. Matcher V1: Chunk and Compete This is the initial release of the GAME Matcher module. It introduces a robust framework for LLM-based entity matching in three key genomic domains: cell types, species, and binding molecules (e.g., Transcription Factors, Histone Modifications). Core Functionality LLM-Powered Matching: Utilizes the gemma3:12b model via the Ollama framework to understand the semantic content of a user's input term. Prompting: Employs sophisticated, few-shot prompt engineering to guide the LLM's reasoning. Chunk-and-Compete Algorithm: To handle potentially thousands of choices, this version implements a two-stage, map-reduce style algorithm: Chunking: The extensive list of potential choices is broken down into smaller, manageable chunks (e.g. of 25 items). The LLM then finds the best candidate ("champion") within each chunk. Championship: All champions from the first stage are collected into a single list. The LLM then performs a final comparison on this list of champions to determine the single best overall match. Running the container Ensure Apptainer is intalled in the system the container is intended to run. Always run the Matcher first, so it can listen for incoming connections from Predictors: apptainer run --containall --nv matcher_v1.sif MATCHER_IP MATCHER_PORT Note on Flags: --nv: This flag enables NVIDIA GPU support inside the container. It is essential for performance, as the LLM requires GPU acceleration for timely inference. --containall: This flag ensures the container is fully self-contained. It prevents the container from accessing the user's home directory or other host system files, guaranteeing that the service runs with only the software and libraries packaged within it for maximum reproducibility. Additional information about the GAME framework can be found on GitHub: Genomic API for Model Evaluation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1440.097

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207