El giro hermenéutico de la fenomenología/ The Hermeneutic Turn of Phenomenology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ES: En la presente investigación se aborda las implicaciones del llamado giro hermenéutico de la fenomenología, en un sentido filosófico, histórico y sobre todo, lingüístico. Revisa las consideraciones y los aportes de la fenomenología de Husserl, en particular la noción de intencionalidad y de Heidegger, en donde el lenguaje es concebido como comprensión del ser. A partir de esa valoración del lenguaje se recurre a los aportes de la hermenéutica de Gadamer, en el horizonte del lenguaje y la “trama lenguajera”, fundamentalmente. EN: In the present investigation the implications of the so-called hermeneutic turn of phenomenology are addressed, in a philosophical, historical and, above all, linguistic sense. Review the considerations and contributions of the phenomenology of Husserl, in particular the notion of intentionality and Heidegger, where language is conceived as understanding of being. Based on this assessment of language, the contributions of Gadamer's hermeneutics, on the horizon of language and the "language plot", are fundamentally used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".