Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cafius bistriatus (Erichson, 1840) NEW BRUNSWICK: Albert Co.: Mary’s Point, 23.VIII.2003, C.G. Majka, coastal dunes, under flotsam, (1, CGMC); Charlotte Co.: Pottery Beach, Passamaquoddy Bay, 29.VII.1976, M.J. Dadswell, (2, CNC); Kent Co.: Kouchibouguac National Park, 1.VI.1977, S.J. Miller (1, CNC); Kouchibouguac National Park, 13.IX.1977, J.M. Campbell, (1, CNC); Restigouche Co.: River Charlo, 24.VII.1972, J.M. Campbell. (1, CNC). NOVA SCOTIA: Cape Breton Co.: Point Aconi, 13.VII.1972, J.M. and B.A. Campbell, (1, CNC); Big Bras d’Or, 25.VII.1972, J.M. Campbell, (1, CNC); Inverness Co.: Cape Breton Highlands National Park: Presqu’île, 13.IX.1984, sifting beach wrack, (40, CNC); 2.5 km SE of Cap Rouge, 14.XI.1984, A. Smetana, (8, CNC); Pleasant Bay, 27.V.1984, L. Masner, sea-beach kelp, (2, CNC); Pleasant Bay, 29.VII.1983, D.E. & J.E. Bright, seashore kelp, (2, CNC); Victoria Co.: Big Bras d’Or, 25.VII.1972, J.M. Campbell, (1, CNC); North Bay Ingonish, Cape Breton Highlands National Park, 29.VI.1983, L. LeSage, seashore wrack, (1, CNC). Cafius bistriatus was recorded in the Maritime Provinces by Frank et al. (1986) and Campbell et al. (1987) and from Newfoundland by Smetana (1965). Its distribution in Atlantic Canada is shown in Fig. 15. It is common in wrack and other debris on marine beaches (Newton et al. 2000). James et al. (1971) reported that Cafius species lay their eggs deep in sand where their larvae prey on amphipods, flies of the genus Fucellia, and small barnacles. Two abundant amphipods associated with Coleoptera in beach drift environments in the Maritime Provinces are Talorchestia longicornis (Say, 1818) in the upper littoral and splash zone, and Orchestia gammarella Pallas, 1766 in beach drift slightly lower down on the coastline (Klimaszewski and Majka 2006). Tal- orchestia megalophthalma (Bate, 1862), O. platensis Kroyer, 1845, and O. grillus (Bosc, 1802) are also present in the region (Gosner 1971).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".