Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tricholita Grote Two undescribed species of Tricholita Grote came to our attention during this revision because of their similarity to Lasionycta. Tricholita can be distinguished from most Lasionycta by the white scales in the reniform spot. In the male genitalia of Tricholita the valve lacks a corona but has an adherent patch of long setae near the apex on the inner dorsal surface, the valve lacks the postsaccular flap characteristic of most Lasionycta, Psammopolia, and Lacinipolia, and the surface of the vesica lacks the band of cornuti that borders the wrinkled folding surface of the vesica in Lasionycta, Eriopygodes, and Lacinipolia, or covers the entire wrinkled surface in Psammopolia and Lasionhada. In the female genitalia the sclerotized surface of the ductus bursae does not extend onto the corpus bursae as in Lasionycta, Psammopolia, and Lacinipolia where it forms a sclerotized trough-like plate in the junction of the corpus bursae and ductus bursae. We take this opportunity to describe these species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.085 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".