Bibliographic record
Abstract
<i>Epuraea peltoides</i> Horn, 1879 <b>Albert Co.:</b> Mary’s Pt., 45.73°N, 64.67°W, 9.VIII.2002, 12.V.2007, C.G. Majka, compost heap, (2, CGMC); <b>Carleton Co.:</b> Jackson Falls, Bell Forest, 46.2200°N, 67.7231°W, 18-27.VI.2008, R.P. Webster, rich Appalachian hardwood forest, Lindgren funnel trap, (1, RWC); <b>Kent Co.:</b> Kouchibouquac National Park, 30.VIII.1977, S.J. Miller, (1, CNC); <b>York Co.:</b> Charters Settlement, 45.8395°N, 66.7391°W,13.IX, 2007, R.P. Webster, mixed forest, in pile of corncobs and cornhusks, (1, RWC). <i>Epuraea peltoides</i> has been recorded in Canada from Alberta east to Québec and Nova Scotia (McNamara 1991; Majka and Cline 2006), and in the United States south to Virginia and west to Indiana and Wisconsin (Parsons 1943). Price and Young (2006) found it on rotting peaches, and at wounded hardwood trees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".