MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893633279 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16755399

Mystonectes Fery & Ribera 2018

2025· article· en· W6893633279 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaDorsumInstarCoronal sutureSimple eye in invertebratesForamenCoronal plane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

General morphological characteristics of the instar III larvae of Mystonectes Fery & Ribera, 2018 Diagnosis: Instar III larvae of Mystonectes can readily be distinguished from those of other genera of Deronectina described in detail (i.e., Deuteronectes Guignot, 1945, Deronectes Sharp, 1882, Hornectes Fery & Ribera, 2018, Leconectes Fery & Ribera, 2018, Nectoporus Guignot, 1950, Neonectes J. Balfour-Browne, 1944, Oreodytes Seidlitz, 1887, and Scarodytes Gozis, 1914.) by the following combination of characters: lateral margin of nasale convex along posterior half (Figs 4, 18); dorsal surface of prementum not fully sclerotized (Fig. 12); lateral margin of prementum with elongate spinulae (Figs 12–13); ratio L3/HW> 3.40 (Table 1); natatory setae along dorsal margin of femora, tibiae, meso- and metatarsi present (Figs 14–15, 20–21), present (one only) or absent on protarsus; urogomphal annuli present (Fig. 6); ratio U1/U2> 4.00 (Table 1); ratio U1/HW> 2.50 (Table 1). Description, instar III (Figs 3–15, 17–21) Body (Figs 3, 17): Fusiformate, narrow. Measurements and ratios that characterize the body shape are shown in Table 1. Head (Figs 4–13, 18): Head capsule (Figs 4, 18) pear-shaped, longer than broad, maximum width posterior to stemmata at about level of occipital suture, with neck constriction distinctly delimited; ecdysial line well marked, coronal line short; occipital foramen broadly emarginate ventrally; frontoclypeus bluntly rounded, lateral margin of nasale convex along posterior half; ventroapical margin of frontoclypeus with 31–35 spatulate setae [= lamellae clypeales of Bertrand (1972)], not interrupted medially; gular suture not visible; ocularium present, stemmata not visible ventrally; tentorial pits visible medioventrally. Antenna (Figs 7–8) elongate, four-segmented, about half as long as HW; A4 the shortest, A2 and A3 the longest, subequal in length, A3 with a ventroapical spinula, A3’ short. Mandible (Fig. 9) falciform, curved inward and upward apically; mandibular channel present. Maxilla (Figs 10–11) with cardo fused to stipes; stipes short, narrow; galea and lacinia absent; MP elongate, three segmented, slightly shorter than antenna, MP1 the longest, MP3 the shortest. Labium (Figs 12–13) with prementum small, subquadrate to subtrapezoidal, slightly longer than broad, with elongate lateral spinulae, anterior margin slightly sinuated medially; LP slightly shorter than MP, two segmented, LP2 shorter than LP1. Thorax (Figs 3, 14–15, 17, 20–21): Pronotum trapezoidal dorsally, ovate laterally, widest at posterior margin; subequal to meso- and metanotum combined; pronotum without transverse carina; both meso- and metathoracic terga with an anterotransverse carina; sagittal line visible on the three tergites; thoracic sterna membranous; mesothorax with a spiracular opening on each side. Legs (Figs 14–15, 20–21): long, composed of six segments (including pretarsus), L1 the shortest, L3 the longest; CO robust, elongate, TR divided into two parts, FE, TI and TA slender, subcylindrical; pretarsus with two long, slender, slightly curved claws, posterior claw shorter than anterior one on L1 and L2, claws subequal in length on L3; claws lacking basoventral spinulae; TI and TA with elongate spinulae along ventral margin, less developed on metatarsus. Abdomen (Figs 3, 5–6, 17, 19): Eight-segmented, segments I–VI sclerotized dorsally, membranous ventrally; segments VII–VIII completely sclerotized, ring-like; tergites I–VII narrow, transverse, rounded laterally, without sagittal line, with anterotransverse carina, with long setae along lateral and posterior margins; segments I–VII with a spiracular opening on each side; segment VIII (= LAS) (Figs 5, 19) short, subtrapezoidal, lateral margin subparallel, slightly converging from base to point of insertion of urogomphi, abruptly converging thereafter, with anterotransverse carina dorsally and laterally; siphon short, bluntly rounded to acute apically. Urogomphus (Fig. 6) elongate, two-segmented; U1 much longer than LAS, with several non-sclerotized annuli. Chaetotaxy (Figs 4–15, 18–21): Head capsule with numerous secondary setae; lateroventral margin of PA with 6–8 spine-like secondary setae; primary seta PA3 elongate, much longer than setae PA1 and PA2 (Figs 4, 18); AN, MX, and LA lacking secondary setae; MN with one hair-like secondary seta on basoexternal margin; thoracic and abdominal sclerites with numerous secondary setae; natatory setae present on dorsal margin of femora, tibiae, and tarsi (Figs 15, 21); secondary leg setation detailed in Table 2; urogomphomere 1 with several secondary setae (Fig. 6).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest ControlFrench-language works237,207