Bibliographic record
Abstract
Syringophilopsis elongatus (Ewing, 1911) Syringophilus elongatus Ewing, 1911: 39. Type material lost (in Kethley: 21). Syringophilus icteridae Clark, 1964: 89, figs. 30 and 31. Material deposited in FMNH, examined. Syringophilopsis elongatus, Kethley 1970: 21, figs. 10 and 11; Bochkov & Galloway 2001: 2023; Skoracki et al. 2008: 299, 2011: 19. Type host: Agelaius phoeniceus (Linnaeus) (Passeriformes: Icteridae). Type locality: USA. Additional material. One female (FMNH A600507-6) from Agelaius phoeniceus (Linnaeus) (Passeriformes: Icteridae), USA: Nebraska, Saline Co., Crete, 7 May 1960, coll. N. Braasch, specimen in FMNH; 2 females (FMNH uncatalogued) from Quiscalus quiscula (Linnaeus) (Passeriformes: Icteridae), USA: Nebraska, Lincoln, 4 September 1944, coll. D. Gates, all material in FMNH. Host and distribution. Agelaius phoeniceus (Linnaeus) (Icteridae) from USA (Arizona, California, Georgia, Maryland, Nebraska) (Ewing 1911; Clark 1964; Kethley 1970; Skoracki et al. 2008, 2011a; present paper) and Canada (Manitoba) (Hood & Welch 1980), Euphagus carolinus (Muller) from USA (Maryland) (Clark 1964), Euphagus cyanocephalus (Wagler) from USA (California) (Skoracki et al. 2008), Quiscalus quiscula (Linnaeus) from USA (Maryland, Nebraska) (Clark 1964; present paper) and Canada (Manitoba) (Bochkov & Galloway 2001), Quiscalus mexicanus (Gmelin) from USA (Texas) (Casto 1976). Remark. Mite species recorded by Casto (1976) from Pheucticus melanocephalus (Cardinalidae) and determined as S. elongatus is presently described as a new species, S. wilsoni sp. nov. (see below).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".