MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893652981 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4225496

Download\\Read Cracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong [Full]

2020· article· en· W6893652981 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaDownloadEconomic impact analysisEconomic riskEconomic analysisEconomic Thought

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Read Or Download Cracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong Full Books By by {"isAjaxComplete_B074KFVN5K":"0","isAjaxInProgress_B074KFVN5K":"0"} Yukon Huang (Author) › Visit Amazon's Yukon Huang Page Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author Are you an author? Learn about Author Central Yukon Huang (Author)\n\nRead Online => Read Cracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong\n\nDownload Book => Download Cracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong\n\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong pdf download\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong read online\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong epub\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong vk\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong pdf\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong amazon\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong free download pdf\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong pdf free\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong pdf\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong epub download\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong online\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong epub download\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong epub vk\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong mobi\n\n\n#downloadbook #book #readonline #readbookonline #ebookcollection #ebookdownload #pdf #ebook #epub #kindle

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0090.010
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0880.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicInnovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine SystemsFrench-language works237,207