MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893652981 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4225496

Download\\Read Cracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong [Full]

2020· article· en· W6893652981 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaDownloadEconomic impact analysisEconomic riskEconomic analysisEconomic Thought

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Read Or Download Cracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong Full Books By by {"isAjaxComplete_B074KFVN5K":"0","isAjaxInProgress_B074KFVN5K":"0"} Yukon Huang (Author) › Visit Amazon's Yukon Huang Page Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author Are you an author? Learn about Author Central Yukon Huang (Author)\n\nRead Online => Read Cracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong\n\nDownload Book => Download Cracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong\n\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong pdf download\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong read online\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong epub\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong vk\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong pdf\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong amazon\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong free download pdf\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong pdf free\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong pdf\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong epub download\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong online\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong epub download\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong epub vk\nCracking the China Conundrum: Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong mobi\n\n\n#downloadbook #book #readonline #readbookonline #ebookcollection #ebookdownload #pdf #ebook #epub #kindle

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicInnovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine SystemsFrench-language works237,207