Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lasionycta phaea species-group The male genitalia of the L. phaea species-group resemble those of the L. skraelingia speciesgroup, but the uncus is broadly flattened and spatulate with a squared-off apex and the digitus is longer, extending below the valve. Females have a distinctly different bursa than those of the L. skraelingia species-group. Th e corpus bursae is ovoid, not rounded, with less sclerotized signa. Th e appendix bursae is attached to the dorsal corpus bursae rather than to the left side and extends dorsally and to the left. Its surface is grooved producing a weak spiral of approximately 1.5 turns. Th e male antenna is beadlike (L. phaea) to biserrate (1.5× as wide as shaft in two Asian species (Lafontaine and Kononenko 1988)). Lasionycta phaea is the only North American member of the species-group. Three additional species, L. alpicola Lafontaine & Kononenko, L. buraetica Kononenko, and L. corax Kononenko, are found in central and western Asia (Lafontaine and Kononenko 1988). The species in this species-group were included in the L. skraelingia species-group by Lafontaine and Kononenko (1988). In addition to the structural differences between the species-groups, L. phaea fails to group with L. skraelingia and L. taigata on CO1 distance analysis, instead clustering near L. secedens (Fig 247).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".