MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893668874 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4655638

Megaraphidia ootsa Archibald & Makarkin 2021, sp. nov.

2021· article· en· W6893668874 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicScarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityRoyal British Columbia Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeOvipositorHead (geology)SternumType localityCanyon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Megaraphidia ootsa sp. nov. Figs 3, 4, 10C, D Type material. Holotype RBCM P1556, found by unknown person on an unknown date, deposited in the RBCM collections. A complete female in lateral aspect with four overlapping wings. Type locality and horizon. Driftwood Canyon Provincial Park, near Smithers, British Columbia, Canada; early Eocene (Ypresian). Etymology. From the Ootsa Lake Group shale within which the holotype is preserved (specific epithet is a noun). Diagnosis. May be distinguished from other species of Megaraphidia by head clearly narrowed posteriorly (cuneate) [broad, not cuneate in M. hopkinsi, M. antiquissima]; ovipositor relatively long (0.34 body length) [0.28 in M. antiquissima]; two intraradial crossveins in both wings [one in other species]. Description. Female. Body length (without ovipositor) approximately 15 mm. Head blackish, clearly narrowed posteriorly; antennae with ≥38 flagellomeres. Prothorax blackish, narrow, relatively short, approximately 2.5 mm long (0.17 body length). Mesothorax, metathorax poorly preserved, blackish. Legs pale, covered with dense, rather short setae; third tarsomeres strongly bifurcate. Abdomen with blackish tergites, sternites; 8th, 9th tergites extend laterally for relative short distance; ectoproct relatively large. Ovipositor relatively long, approximately 5.1 mm (0.34 body length). Forewing approximately 12 mm long, 3.5 mm wide (length/width: 3.43). Costal space relatively narrow (two times wider than subcostal space), widest at 1/5 length (basal-most portion obscured); eight preserved subcostal veinlets (probably ≥10), all simple, relatively closely spaced. ScP long, terminating on costal margin notably distad crossvein 2ra-rp; length from termination of ScP to pterostigma approximately half length of pterostigma (measured along C). Subcostal space broad, with basal crossvein 1scp-r slightly proximad fork of M; distal crossvein 2scp-r (basal margin of pterostigma) markedly incurved (joins C proximad basad joining RA). Pterostigma rhombic (distal margin oblique, angled opposite to basal), relatively short, strongly pigmented. Two RA branches detected (branch presumed within pterostigma not discernible): one forming distal margin of pterostigma; other distad this (simple in right wing, forked in left wing). Stem of RA simple in right wing, forked in left wing, entering margin well before wing apex. RA space with two crossveins forming two radial cells: 2ra-rp located well proximad termination of ScP; 3ra-rp located in distal part of pterostigma along RA (at approximately 2.45 wing length), with five pectinate branches: RP1 deeply forked, its anterior branch simple, posterior forked once; other branches once or twice forked. Two intraradial crossveins: rp1-rp 2 in right wing between RP2, RP1, in left wing between anterior trace of RP, RP1; other between RP2, RP3. Three crossveins between RP, MA: 1r-m, 2r-m connecting stem of RP, stem of MA; 3r-m connecting RP1, anterior branch of MA. M joined with CuA for short distance (seen on left wing, obscured on right wing); forked well proximad origin of RP. MA deeply dichotomously forked twice (one branch in each right and left wings further shallowly forked). MP zigzagged with four simple, pectinate branches. Two intramedian crossveins forming two doi; basal doi slightly shorter than distal. Basal parts of Cu not visible. Anterior trace of CuA strongly zigzagged, fused with MP for short distance (forming part of posterior side of basal doi), with two pectinate long simple branches (left wing) or one deeply forked branch (right wing). CuP simple. Crossvein icu between CuA, CuP long. AA1 rather deeply forked; small portion of AA2 visible. Hind wing approximately 11 mm long, approximately 3.4 mm wide (length/width: 3.24). Costal space relatively broad (incompletely preserved); four preserved subcostal veinlets (right wing) simple, widely spaced. ScP long; length from termination of ScP to pterostigma shorter than length of pterostigma. One crossvein detected in subcostal space (2scp-r, forming basal margin of pterostigma), slightly incurved. Pterostigma nearly equal in length with that in forewing. RA with two to three branches detected (branch presumed within pterostigma not discernible), branch forming distal margin of pterostigma straight; one (right wing) to two (left wing) simple, slightly curved branches distad pterostigma. Three crossveins between RA, RP: 1ra-rp located slightly distad 2r-m; 2ra-rp located notably proximad termination of ScP (left wing, but only slightly proximad in right wing); 3ra-rp located in distal half of pterostigma along RA. RP originating at approximately 0.36 wing length. Anterior trace of RP forked apically, with four branches, two proximad 3ra-rp, two distad. RP1 deeply forked, its anterior branch simple, posterior forked once; most other branches rather deeply forked. Two intraradial crossveins: one connecting stem of RP, RP1; other between RP2, RP3. Three crossveins between R, M: 1r-m very long, subparallel to R (basal portion obscured); 2r-m connecting stems of RP, MA slightly proximad 1ra-rp; 3r-m connecting RP1, anterior branch of MA. M forked close to or slight basad level of origin of RP. MA deeply dichotomously forked twice. MP: anterior trace zigzagged, with four simple pectinate branches (basal-most branch in left wing forked). Two intramedian crossveins forming two doi; basal doi markedly shorter than distal. One crossvein (2m-cu) detected between M, Cu straight, proximad 1im. CuA with two (left wing) to three (right wing) simple branches. Small portions of CuP preserved. Remarks. In this specimen, light areas of the head, thorax, and abdomen (Fig. 3) surely do not represent colouration of the living insect, but were most likely caused by post-mortem damage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0970.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicScarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and BiogeographyFrench-language works237,207