MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893673250 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3790186

Lasionycta perplexella Crabo & Lafontaine 2009, sp. n.

2009· article· en· W6893673250 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypePavilionPoint (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasionycta perplexella Crabo & Lafontaine, sp. n. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: D9079DC1-8D24-40EC-93DE-B0064DC28F89 Figs 110–112, 159, 215. Map 11 Type Material. Holotype ♁. Canada, British Columbia, Pavilion Mtn, 50°58' N 121° 41' W, 6860’, 30 July 2000, Troubridge & Hensel. CNC. Paratypes 99 ♁, 15 ♀. Canada. Alberta. Hailstone Butte, Route 532, 50.20° N 114.44° W, 6600–6800’, 18 July 2006, L. G. Crabo (8 ♁, 4 ♀). British Columbia. Same data as for holotype (58 ♁, 1 ♀); Gott Peak, 50.36° N 122.14° W, 7100’, 30 July 1994, L. Crabo and J. Troubridge (1 ♁), 6 Aug. 2005, L. G. Crabo (1 ♁, 1 ♀), 26 July 2006, L. G. Crabo (10 ♁, 1 ♀); Coast Range, Perkins Peak, 51.82-[51.8] 3° N 125.02-[125.0] 5° W, 6230–7400’, L. G. Crabo (1 ♁); Mission Ridge, 50.76-[50.7] 7° N 122.16-[122]. 20° W, 6000’, 15–16 July 1994, L. Crabo and J. Troubridge (6 ♁, 1 ♀); Watch Peak, 50.47-[50]. 48° N 116.29° W, 7900–9300’, 23 July 1994, L. Crabo and J. Troubridge (3 ♁, 1 ♀). Yukon. Montana Mtn, 60.07-[60.0] 8° N 134.68-[134]. 72° W, 1670–1860 m., 3 July 1989, L. G. Crabo and J. P. Pelham (1 ♁). USA. Washington. Chelan County, Junior Point Camp Ground, 47.99° N 120.39° W, 2010 m., 4 Aug. 1989, L. Crabo and C. Coughlin (7 ♁, 4 ♀); Okanogan County, Tiff any Meadows, 48.69° N 119.96° W, 6200’, 7 Aug. 1993, L. G. and A. G. Crabo (1 ♀); Whatcom County, Harts Pass, 48.73° N 120.66° W, 2000 m., 25 July 1987, L. G. Crabo (1 ♁), 8 Aug. 1987, L. G. Crabo (1 ♁, 1 ♀), 2 Aug. 1991 (1 ♁). AMNH, CNC, LGC, OSU, UASM, USNM, WSU. Etymology. The name perplexella refers to the resemblance of this species to a small L. perplexa. Diagnosis. Lasionycta perplexella closely resembles L. perplexa but the male antenna is biserrate rather than bipectinate as described under L. perplexa. Females of these species cannot be reliably differentiated without DNA sequencing and are best sorted by association with males. Subtle differences in their appearance are described under L. perplexa. Lasionycta perplexella is structurally indistinguishable from L. subalpina, including the antenna, but can be sorted by locality since L. perplexella occurs in the Pacific Northwest and L. subalpina is found in the central Rocky Mountains and Sierra Nevada. Th ey also have different ventral hindwings as described under L. subalpina. The male genitalia of L. perplexella and L. subalpina are indistinguishable. The valves are shorter than those of L. perplexa and have a larger costal lobe that extends above the valve. Th e part of the vesica extending beyond the basal coil is shorter than in L. perplexa. Th e female genitalia are indistinguishable. The CO1 sequences of L. perplexella differ by at least 1.95 % from those of L. perplexa. Two known CO1 haplotypes of L. perplexella differ by 0.5 % (Fig. 248). Description. Head – Antenna of male biserrate and fasciculate, individual segments triangular, 1.9–2.1× as wide as central shaft. Antenna of female filiform and ciliate. Dorsal segments charcoal gray proximally and white distally. Scape white, tuft of scales at dorsal antenna white-tipped gray. Eye normal sized. Palpus of brownish off-white, white, and charcoal scales. Frons with equal mixture of white and dark-gray hair-like scales. Top of head white-tipped dark-gray, dark-gray, and few white scales. Thorax – Vestiture a mixture of light- and medium-gray hair-like scales and whitetipped medium- and dark-gray scales, appearing pencil-lead gray. Prothoracic collar dark gray anteriorly and silver gray posteriorly. Patagium with ground color of thorax centrally and darker gray peripherally. Legs covered with slate gray and white scales. Tarsal segments slate gray with distal white rings. Wings – Forewing length: male 11– 14 mm (expanse 30–36 mm); females 13–15mm (expanse 33–36 mm). Ground color of forewing a mixture of medium- and dark-gray, white, and scattered luteous scales, appearing slightly mottled pencil-lead gray. Basal, antemedial, and postmedial lines double, dark gray with lighter gray filling, strongest at costa. Basal and antemedial line jagged, zigzagged. Medial line dark gray, complete. Postmedial line scalloped between veins, inner part clearly defined and outer part barely visible, broadly convex from costa to bottom of cell, and then nearly straight to posterior margin of wing. Subterminal line pale gray, irregular, preceded by a darker gray shade forming chevrons between veins. Spots dark gray. Orbicular spot round to oval, filled with light gray peripherally and a dark-gray ocellus centrally, lighter filling usually similar to filling of transverse lines, rarely lightest shading on forewing. Reniform spot kidney shaped, variable in size and conspicuousness, barely visible in a few specimens and complete and filled with pale gray peripherally and dark gray centrally in most specimens. Claviform spot filled with ground color, extending ¼ to ½ distance from antemedial line to postmedial line. Fringe dark gray, very weakly checkered with medium-gray between veins. Ventral forewing slightly brownish medium gray with scattered lighter scales along costa, distal to postmedial line, and at apex. Discal spot slightly darker gray. Postmedial line faint, most evident anterior to lower cell. Distal wing uniform dark gray. Dorsal hindwing light brownish gray with slightly darker gray discal spot, postmedial line, and indistinct marginal band. Hindwing fringe two-toned, dark gray proximally and light gray distally. Ventral hindwing a mixture of off-white and scattered gray scales, lighter gray than ventral forewing. Discal spot dark gray, relatively small, ovoid to weakly triangular. Postmedial line relatively faint, sinuous, most evident near costal margin. Marginal band of darker gray suffusion than remainder of wing. Fringe light gray. Abdomen – A mixture of light- and medium-gray scales. Dorsal tuft on first segment with white-tipped charcoal colored scales. Male genitalia – (Fig. 159). Genital capsule and aedeagus as in L. leucocycla species-group and L. perplexa sub-group descriptions. Valve approximately 6× as long as wide. Costal lobe of sacculus larger than that of L. perplexa, extending dorsal to valve margin. Vesica with 0–2 basal cornuti (N = 2), distal straight part slightly shorter than in L. perplexa. Female genitalia – (Fig. 215). Ovipositor lobe, segment VIII, and bursa copulatrix as in L. leucocycla species-group and L. perplexa sub-group descriptions. Corpus bursae approximately 1× as long as ductus bursae and 0.7× as wide as long. Distribution and biology. Lasionycta perplexella occurs from southern Yukon to southern Alberta and southern Washington. It is found in subalpine spruce and fir forest, typically at higher elevation than L. perplexa. Adults are nocturnal and come to light. It has been collected from mid-July through August.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicCrustacean biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207