MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893680081 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4362433

Liogenys calcarata Frey 1970

2020· article· en· W6893680081 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeParatypeMale genitalia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liogenys calcarata Frey, 1970 Figs. 2, 13E, 14 Liogenys calcaratus Frey, 1970: 283; Krajčík 2012: 144 (checklist). Liogenys calcarata: Evans 2003: 207 (checklist); Evans & Smith 2009: 176 (checklist); Cherman et al. 2016: 759 (systematics); Cherman et al. 2017: 16 (taxonomy). Type material. Male holotype of Liogenys calcarata (NMHB): [white, typeset] “ ARGENTINA / 20 km N. La Rioja / 24.9.68 leg. Pena ”, [red typeset] “TYPE”, [white typeset and handwritten] “Type / Liogenys / calcaratus / n. sp. / det. G. Frey, 1970 ”, genitalia mounted. One male paratype (NHMB), five males and one female paratypes (AMNH) with the same data of the holotype. Male paratype (ZMHB): [white, typeset] “ ARGENTINA / 20 km N. La Rioja / 24.9.68 leg. Pena ”, [red typeset] “PARATYPE”, [white, typeset and handwritten] “ Liogenys / calcaratus / n. sp. / det. G. Frey, 1970 ”. Four male and two female paratypes (CMNC): [white, typeset] “ ARGENTINA / 20 km N. La Rioja / 24.9.68 leg. Pena ”, [yellow handwritten and typeset] “ LIOGENYS / CALCARATUS / FREY / PARATYPE”, [white, typeset and handwritten] “ Liogenys / calcaratus / det. G. Frey, 1970 / n sp”, [white, typeset] “H. & A. HOWDEN / COLLECTION / ex. A. Martinez coll.”. Non-type material (12). ARGENTINA. San Juan: El Baldecito, Valle Fertil, XII.1964, A. Martínez, 1 male (CMNC); Buenos Aires: Estancia Barraú (30 km SW Villa Iris), XII.1946, A. Martínez, 1 male (CMNC); Puán, Felipe Solá, XII.1953, A. Martínez, 1 female (CMNC); San Luis: Arizona (18 km S), 250 m, 18–23.I.1982, H. & A. Howden, 1 female (CMNC); Mendoza: San Rafael, 6.XII.1988, L. Peña, 4 females (INPA); Río Negro: Coronel Gómez, I.1958, A. Martínez, 2 females (NHMUK); Chubut: Dolavon, Angostura, 1.V.2011, 43°18’36’’S, 65°42’36’’W, D. Rojas Lanus, 1 female (VMDC). Diagnosis. Body elongate; dull yellow (Fig. 2A), pronotum shiny, unicolored with elytra; elytra shiny or semiopaque, with bristles, inconspicuous bristles throughout the elytron and also on frontoclypeal surface; clypeal emargination deep, wide and rounded; clypeal lateral margin convex, blunt projected; antenna with 10 antennomeres; pronotal posterior corners rounded (Fig. 2B); protibia with three teeth, distance between basal and middle teeth longer than the distance between middle and apical teeth; mesotibia quadrate in cross section (Fig. 2D); pygidium flat; subtrapezoidal; pygidial disc smooth, inconspicuous bristles throughout, bristles longer towards the apex (Fig. 2C); in males inner margin of metatibia weakly carinate towards apex; metatibial apical spurs of different lengths and shape, the longer spur equal to the diameter of the tibial apex, the shorter spur wider and projected laterally (Fig. 2E); protarsomere II very wide; inner margins of parameres concave; parameres three times the length of the apex; apex lanceolate, outer margins expanded in a plane below at the base (Fig. 2F). Redescription. Length: 8.2–9.5 mm; width: 3.4–4.8 mm. Dull yellow. Head. Distance between eyes twice the width of one eye; frons swollen, longer than the clypeus, frontoclypeal surface with inconspicuous bristles; clypeal emargination deep, wide and rounded; outer sides of anterior teeth subparallel; clypeal lateral margin convex, blunt projected; canthus exceeding the outer margin of the eye; distal maxillary palpomere, maximum width slightly wider than the apex; fovea deep, very small, only at the base; antenna with 10 antennomeres, club lighter in color than funicle. Thorax: anterior margin of pronotum slightly produced medially; pronotal disc with punctures fine and sparse; posterior corners rounded; hypomere with short bristles; mesepisternum, sides of metaventrite and metacoxae with bristles; disc of metaventrite with abundant spine-like bristles; distance between mesocoxae and metacoxae twice the metacoxa length; scutellum ogival, smooth. Elytra: shiny or semiopaque, inconspicuous bristles throughout the elytron, a row of short bristles on the fourth ridge; elytral suture and elytron unicolored, slightly elevated; all four elytral ridges barely noticeable. Legs: procoxa with bristles, weakly scaly and punctate; protibia with three teeth equal in size; distance between basal and middle teeth longer than the distance between middle and apical teeth; mesofemur with thick, erect bristles along the inferior margin; mesotibia quadrate in cross section, mesotibial surface smooth; mesotibia with two transverse carinae present posteriorly; metafemur with thick, erect bristles along the inferior margin; males with inner margin of metatibia weakly carinate towards apex; surface finely sculptured, almost smooth; metatibia with two transverse carinae present posteriorly; males with metatibial apical spurs of different lengths and shape, the longer spur equal to the diameter of the tibial apex, the shorter spur wider and projected laterally; metatarsomere I shorter and equal in width to tarsomere II; protarsomeres and mesotarsomeres I–IV enlarged, protarsomere II very wide; protarsomeres less than twice wider than the mesotarsomeres; claw bifid, symmetrical, superior tooth of claw longer and wider than the inferior tooth; distance between teeth longer to the length of inferior tooth. Abdomen: ventrites with erect bristles at the disc, more abundant on ventrites II and III; propygidium with few bristles; pygidium flat; subtrapezoidal; pygidial width not exceeding distance between spiracles of propygidium; pygidial disc smooth, inconspicuous bristles throughout, a few longer bristles towards the apex; pygidial apex subquadrate. Parameres: basal region slightly wider than both sections of the parameres at its maximum width, parameral split at 2/3 the length of the basal region; inner margins concave; three times the length of the apex; apex lanceolate, outer margins weakly expanded in a plane below at the base; parameres in lateral view convex, coplanar (Fig. 2G). Type locality. ARGENTINA. 20 km N La Rioja [near El Cantadero, 29°14’28.9’’S 66°51’20.3’’W]. Geographical distribution. ARGENTINA (La Rioja, San Juan, Buenos Aires, Mendoza, San Luis, Río Negro, Chubut). Remarks. Liogenys calcarata resembles L. flaveola in the body color, size, and in the shape of tibiae and pygidium. Liogenys calcarata differs from L. flaveola (in parenthesis) in the clypeal emargination deep (shallow); pronotal punctures finer; pygidial disc with bristles (glabrous); males with metatibial spurs uneven, the shorter spur wider and asymmetrically projected (truncate but not projected). The parameres of both species have apex lanceolate, in L. calcarata the outer margins are expanded in a plane below (in one plane). This species also resembles L. kuntzeni in the shape of the apex lanceolate, and at its base the outer margin is also expanded in a plane below. In the case of L. calcarata, the expanded portion at the base of the apex is very narrow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it