Allocapnia menawa Grubbs & Sheldon 2008, sp. n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Allocapnia menawa sp. n. (Figs. 25-32) Material examined. Holotype ♂ and paratype ♀, U.S.A., Alabama, Clay Co., tributary to Cheaha Creek, Talladega National Forest, 19 km N Ashland, 33.4397°N, 085.8387°W, 28 December 2007, S.A. Grubbs (INHS). Additional paratypes: same but 14 ♂, 6 ♀ (WKU); same but 4 December 2006, 1 ♂, A.L. Sheldon (WKU). Male. Body length 5.0–6.0 mm. Wings reaching from 5 th to the 7 th abdominal terga. Seventh abdominal terga unmodified. Dorsal process of 8 th terga elevated steeply above the abdominal plane (Fig. 25); process generally flat or weakly convex in lateral view with paired, poorly-developed, subapical setose processes (Figs. 26–28); process rugose, outer aspect broadly ushaped, inner aspect v-shaped, process lobes separated by shallow emargination anteriormedially (Fig. 27–28). Apical limb of epiproct upper limb subequal in length of basal limb (Fig. 25), markedly enlarged in distal half with slight subterminal emargination (Fig. 29), expanded slightly medially in dorsal view, tip broadly rounded (Figs. 30–31). Female. Body length 6.0–7.0 mm. Wings reaching 8 th terga to beyond tip of abdomen. Eighth abdominal sterna darkly sclerotized medially, only slightly sclerotized laterally, terminating in saginate projection posteriorly; separated from 7 th sterna by membrane (Fig. 32). Etymology. The species name, used as a noun in apposition, honors Menawa of the Upper Creek Native Americans. Menawa was a Creek leader who was instrumental in opposing encroachment on Creek lands. The common name, Menawa snowfly, is proposed for this species (Stark et al. 1998). Diagnosis. Allocapnia menawa is a member of the A. granulata group (Ross & Ricker 1971), which is currently comprised of seven species. Five species in particular, A. frisoni Ross & Ricker, A. granulata (Claassen), A. peltoides Ross & Ricker, A. unzickeri Ross & Yamamoto and A. warreni Ross & Yamamoto, possess the subapical paired setose processes exhibited by A. menawa. The remaining two species in this group, A. fumosa Ross and A. simmonsi Kondratieff & Voshell, lack setose processes. Allocapnia menawa most closely resembles A. granulata, A. unzickeri, and A. warreni. The epiproct apical limb to basal limb ratio of 1X exhibited by A. menawa (Fig. 25) is readily distinguished from A. unzickeri and A. warreni. Both A. unzickeri (Fig. 33) and A. warreni (Ross & Ricker 1971, Fig. 23) possess an epiproct apical limb that is noticeably longer than the basal limb and have slim profiles in lateral aspect. Although the epiproct of A. granulata varies considerably across its broad range (Ross & Yamamoto 1967), the combination of the heavily enlarged epiproct apical limb and the dorsal process of the 8 th abdominal terga can differentiate A. menawa. The moderately enlarged apical limb of A. granulata depictedherefromsouthernKentucky (Fig. 34) and western Pennsylvania (Fig. 35) are typical of the central and northern populations with eastern genitalia described by Ross & Yamamoto (1967) yet not to the extent of A. menawa (Figs. 25, 29). The rugose dorsal process of A. granulata bears lobes that vary in length but are well separated apically (Figs. 37–38). In contrast, the dorsal process lobes of A. menawa are nearly convergent anteriomedially and appear triangular posteriorly (Fig. 28). The lobes of A. granulata are broadly rounded posteriorly. The females of A. menawa (Fig. 32) and A. granulata (Fig. 40) are very similar, and species recognition requires associated males. The female of A. unzickeri is easily distinguished from A. menawa since the 8 th abdominal sterna of the former species is either broadly truncate (Fig. 39) or slightly concave. The female of A. warreni is unknown. The geographic range of A. menawa is allopatric with A. granulata, A. unzickeri, and A. warreni. Allocapnia granulata has a broad geographical range in the eastern Nearctic region, recorded from Oklahoma north to Minnesota and Quebec and south to Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia (Ross & Ricker 1971; Poulton & Stewart 1991; Kondratieff & Baumann 2000; Nations et al. 2007). Allocapnia granulata has also been collected from large streams flanking the Appalachian Mountains, yet does not extend to smaller, upland streams of the Talladega National Forest area. James (1972; Fig. 118) recorded this species only from two northeastern Alabama counties. Allocapnia unzickeri is distributed mainly within the Cumberland Plateau region in southern Tennessee and A. warreni is known only from northwestern Arkansas (Poulton & Stewart, 1991). Remarks. Allocapnia menawa has been collected only from the type locality, but is likely to be found from additional upland stream habitats in the Talladega National Forest area. Allocapnia aurora, A. muskogee n. sp., and A. recta were the only other stonefly species obtained with A. menawa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".