Chiroderma Garbino & Lim & Tavares 2020
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key to the species and subspecies of genus Chiroderma 1 Size small, forearm equal to or less than 42 mm, greatest length of skull equal to or less than 23 mm ................... 2 - Size intermediate to large, forearm equal to or more than 43 mm, greatest length of skull equal to or more than 23 mm ...... ................................................................................................... 3 2 First lower premolar longer than high mesiodistally; third cuspid of first lower premolar absent; crown of lower canine at the same level or higher than the tip of the coronoid process of the mandibular bone.................... Chiroderma gorgasi - First lower premolar higher than long mesiodistally; third cuspid of first lower premolar present; crown of lower canine clearly below the level of the top of the coronoid process of the mandibular bone........................ Chiroderma trinitatum 3 Size large, length of forearm equal to or more than 56 mm, greatest length of skull equal to or more than 28 mm; first lower premolar in contact with the lower canine and second premolar............................... Chiroderma improvisum - Size intermediate to large, forearm length equal to or less than 54 mm (43–54 mm), greatest length of skull usually equal to or less than 28 mm (23–28 mm); diastema between first lower premolar and second lower premolar...................... 4 4 Size large, forearm length 47–54 mm, greatest length of skull 26–29 mm; dorsal pelage brown or dark brown; basal and terminal bands of the dorsal hairs of a same color................................................................ 5 - Size intermediate, forearm length 43–50 mm, greatest length of skull 23–26 mm; dorsal pelage brown, light brown or buff; base of dorsal hairs darker than terminal band................................................................... 6 5 First lower premolar large, with approximately ⅔ the height of second lower premolar; crown of lower canine clearly below the level of the top of the coronoid process of the mandibular bone; paraoccipital processes present....................................................................................................... Chiroderma doriae doriae - First lower premolar small, with approximately ¼ the height of second lower premolar; crown of lower canine approximately the same height as the top of the coronoid process of the mandibular bone; paraoccipital processes absent..................................................................................................... Chiroderma salvini 6 Tip of noseleaf unnotched; facial stripes bright and conspicuous; posterior process of the palate absent; first upper incisors with convergent tips....................................................................................... 7 - Tip of noseleaf notched; facial stripes dark and inconspicuous; posterior process of the palate present; first upper incisors with parallel or divergent tips................................................................................ 8 7 Length of forearm usually more than 48 mm (45–50 mm); greatest length of skull equal to or more than 25 mm (25–27 mm); high-crowned first lower premolar (⅔ the height of second lower premolar; low-crowned lower canine, with the tips clearly below the level of the top of the coronoid process of the mandibular bone.................... Chiroderma doriae vizottoi - Length of forearm equal to or less than 47 mm (43–47 mm); greatest length of skull equal to or less than 25 mm (23–25 mm); low-crowned first lower premolar (¼ the height of second lower premolar); high-crowned lower canine, with the tips approximately the same height as the top of the coronoid process of the mandibular bone................ Chiroderma scopaeum 8 Length of forearm 46 mm on average (41–52 mm); distributed east of the Andes........... Chiroderma villosum villosum - Length of forearm 44 mm on average (41–47 mm); distributed west of the Andes............. Chiroderma villosum jesupi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".