Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aleochara (Emplenota) litoralis (Mäklin, 1853) NEW BRUNSWICK: Albert Co.: Mary’s Point, 23.VIII.2003, C.G. Majka, beach drift below sand dunes, (3, CGMC). NOVA SCOTIA: Cape Breton Co.: Scatarie Island, N.W. Cove, 8.VIII.2005, 11.VIII.2005, K.R. Aikens, & A. MacDonald, ocean beach, under wrack, (2, CBU); Richmond Co.: Framboise, Morrison, 15.VI.1997, D.B. McCorquodale, beach, (3, CBU); Halifax Co.: Point Pleasant Park, 23.VII.2002, C.G. Majka, under decaying seaweed on sand beach, (3, CGMC). Aleochara litoralis was reported from New Brunswick, Newfoundland, and Nova Scotia by Klimaszewski (1984). Additional records are given above. Its distribution in the region of Atlantic Canada is shown in Fig. 12. The adults and larvae are found in decaying seaweed and debris on ocean beaches (Klimaszewski 1984). Aleochara adults are predators of larvae and eggs of cyclorrhaphous Diptera and ectoparasitoids of the pupae as larvae (Klimaszewski 1984). The specific hosts of A. litoralis have not previously been documented, however, C.G. Majka has collected Coelopa frigida (Fabricius, 1805) (Diptera: Coelopidae), a common and widespread Holarctic fly, in Point Pleasant Park in association with A. litoralis. Adults, larvae, and pupae of this fly were very numerous in the decomposing seaweed and are presumably the prey species utilized by A. litoralis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".