Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tribe RHYPARINI Schmidt, 1910 Original spelling and citation: Rhyparina Schmidt 1910: 130 Type genus: Rhyparus Westwood, 1845: xciii (Westwood 1845 b *) Remark: The original spelling of the type genus is Ryparus and Agassiz (1847) later made the unjustified emendation to Rhyparus. Since this unjustified emendation is in prevailing usage, it should be considered a justified emendation (Article 33.2.3.1). The emended spelling avoids homonymy with Ryparus Spinola, 1844 (Coleoptera: Cleridae). Rhyparus Westwood, 1845 is a senior homonym of Rhyparus Agassiz, 1847 (Coleoptera: Cleridae). The later name is an unjustified emendation of Ryparus Spinola, 1844 and is not in prevailing usage. Since the emended spelling is not in prevailing usage for the Cleridae name, Ryparus Spinola, 1844 and the Cleridae Rhyparus Agassiz, 1847 should both be treated as separate names.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".