Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lasionycta quadrilunata (Grote) Figs 54–56, 166, 167, 222, 223. Map 14 Anarta quadrilunata Grote, 1874b: 244 Lasiestra quadrilunata; McDunnough 1938: 71. Lasionycta quadrilunata; Lafontaine et al. 1986: 263. Lasionycta quadrilunata yukona Lafontaine, 1986: 264. Type material. Anarta quadrilunata: holotype ♀ [USNM, examined]. Type locality: Colorado Territory. Lasionycta quadrilunata yukona: holotype ♀ [CNC, examined]. Type locality: 17 km WNW Burwash Flats, Yukon. Diagnosis. Lasionycta quadrilunata is an alpine species characterized by a large hindwing discal spot, a short broad digitus resembling an obtuse triangle, and a small rounded cucullus bearing a corona of four rows of setae. Th e forewing is light gray or slate gray with a yellow or olive tint. Th e dark-gray transverse lines are prominent but the spots are indistinct. Th e female bursa is similar to that of L. staudingeri but L. quadrilunata has an increased number of short setae on abdominal segment VIII, similar to L. lagganata. The male antenna of quadrilunata is weakly biserrate, almost beadlike (1.4× the width of the central shaft). Distribution and biology. Records of L. quadrilunata form an arc on a map, from south-central Alaska down the spine of the Rocky Mountains to Colorado. It flies over scree tundra and is diurnal. The flight period is from mid-July to early August. Geographical variation. The populations of L. quadrilunata are arranged in two subspecies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".