Onichodon canadensis Brown 1940
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Onichodon canadensis (Brown, 1940) NEW BRUNSWICK: Saint John Co.: Saint John, 6.viii.1900, W. McIntosh, NBM. NOVA SCOTIA: Annapolis Co.: Durland Lake, 12.vii.2003, P. Dollin, mixed hemlock, balsam fir, and black spruce forest, NSMC; Antigonish Co.: Beaver Mountain Park, 14.viii.1995, J. Ogden, NSNR; Halifax Co.: Point Pleasant Park, 5.viii.2001, C.G. Majka, red spruce forest, CGMC; Kings Co.: Forest Home, 8.vii.2006, D.H. Webster, deciduous forest, DHWC; Pictou Co.: Waterside, 11.viii.2004, D. MacDonald, flight intercept trap, (4), NSNR; Queens Co.: Kejimkujik National Park, Lake Kejimkujik, 5.viii.1961, D.C. Ferguson, NSMC; Tobeatic Lake, 1.viii.2003, P. Dollin, red spruce forest, funnel trap, NSMC. PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND: Kings Co.: Lakeside Beach, 3.viii.1997, D.B. McCorquodale, CBU. Although Bousquet (1991) listed this species from both New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, Muona (2000) did not record it from either province and there are no specimens in the CNC or in any other collection examined. Thus the above records establish the species' presence in both provinces. It is additionally newly recorded from Prince Edward Island (Fig. 4). Reared from yellow birch (Betula allagheniensis Britt.) (Betulaceae) and found associated with red spruce (Picea rubens) and American beech (Fagus grandifolia) (Muona 2000). Restricted in its distribution to northeastern North America (Muona 2000).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".