MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893735949 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4332625

Chiroderma scopaeum Handley 1966

2020· article· en· W6893735949 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Biology and Applications
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ontario Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkullDorsumMandible (arthropod mouthpart)Type localityLower lip

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chiroderma scopaeum Handley, 1966 Synonyms: Chiroderma [sp.]: Anderson, 1960: 7. Chiroderma salvini scopaeum Handley, 1966a:297; type locality “ Pueblo Juárez, Colima, México.” Type Material. The type of C. salvini scopaeum, by original designation, is specimen USNM 338711, an adult female collected by Alfred L. Gardner (field number ALG 1565) in Pueblo Juaréz, Mexican state of Colima, on August 19, 1960. The specimen was previously stored in the University of Arizona collection, under the number 7952. The material consists of a stuffed skin with skull and mandible separated. The skin is in good condition, and both pairs of facial stripes are visible. The median dorsal stripe is also visible and located immediately posterior to the nape and extending to the posterior extremity of the animal. The auditory bullae have separated from the skull and upper inner incisors are missing. The posterior palatine process is absent. Distribution and Habitat. We consider C. scopaeum to be restricted to México, west of the isthmus of Tehuantepec (Fig. 11). The species has been recorded in the states of Chihuahua, Sinaloa, Durango, Nayarit, Jalisco, Colima, México, Morelos, Guerrero, Puebla, Veracruz, and Oaxaca (Anderson 1960; Handley 1966a; Crossin et al. 1973; Alvarez & Alvarez-Castañeda 1996; Valiente-Banuet et al. 1997). Hall (1981) suggests that C. scopaeum would occur from western México to northwestern Costa Rica, and based on this distribution Reid & Langtimm (1993) identified specimen USNM 565812 as C. salvini scopaeum. The morphological characters of the specimen, however, have allowed us to identify it as C. salvini. Records of C. scopaeum are from areas dominated by tropical and subtropical coniferous forests, dry deciduous forests at higher elevations, and shrubby vegetation at lower elevations. Studies suggest that in the arid areas of western México, the species would be restricted to the more humid areas close to the Pacific coast and adjacent montane forests, and along the riparian forests in the canyons that cut through the Sierra Madre Occidental (Anderson 1960, 1972; Crossin et al. 1973; García-Mendoza & López-González 2013). All analyzed specimens were collected within the altitudinal range of the species as reported by Handley (1966a), from sea level to 1,722 m. Description and Comparisons. Dorsal pelage varies from pale brown to dark brown. Most of the 38 specimens examined had pale brown pelage (84.2%, n=32), whereas dark brown pelage was found in 15.8% (n=6). Individually, dorsal hairs are tricolored, with a dark brown base, buff middle band, and light to dark brown tips. The medial dorsal stripe was present in all specimens (n=34), but was weakly developed in 5.8% of the sample (n=2). Usually, the dorsal stripe extends from the interscapular region to the posterior extremity of the body, but in 10 specimens the stripe originated in the region immediately posterior to the nape. Both pairs of facial stripes are bright and wide (interocular stripe> 1.7 mm). The tragus and base of the ears are yellowish, as are the anterior and posterior margins of the ears close to the base. The remainder of the ear is brown. The spear of the noseleaf has a simple tip and is brown, except for the lateral margins of the horseshoe, which are whitish. The dimensions of the skull of C. scopaeum are similar to those of C. villosum, and there is also some overlap between the large C. scopaeum and the small C. doriae vizottoi and C. salvini (Tables 7 and 8). In dorsal view, the brain case is round and less massive than in C. salvini. Approximately ⅓ of the length of the nasal notch extends behind the anterior margin of the orbits. The post-orbital constriction is relatively wide (Table 7); post-orbital processes are small and pointed. A sagittal crest was unambiguously present in 32 of the 38 specimens (84.2%), but not detected in 2 (5.2%), or ambiguous in 4 (10.5%). The posterior palatine process was absent in 32 of the 38 analyzed specimens (83.8%), but small or vestigial in the remaining 6 (16.2%). Out of 35 specimens, 30 (85.7%) had convergent I1s, with the tips touching each other; whereas, 5 had both incisors separated along their entire length. The P3 is approximately oval in occlusal outline and is not in contact with P4. The M2 has well defined main cusps, but lacks a posterolingual cingulum. The lower canine has a relatively low crown, below the level of the coronoid process in lateral view. The anterior cingulum of the lower canine projects rostro-medially and is visible in lateral view (Fig. 17). The p2 is small, approximately ¼ of the height of p4; and is longer than tall and does not touch p4. Compared with C. salvini, C. scopaeum can be distinguished by its smaller size, usually paler dorsal pelage (varying from pale brown to dark brown). C. scopaeum has a relatively broader post-orbital constriction (Fig. 12), and rostro-medially projected cingula of lower canines (Fig. 17). From C. villosum, C. scopaeum can be differentiated by its bicolored noseleaf and spear having a simple tip; paler ear margins; shorter nasal notch (in villosum the notch reaches the post-orbital processes); shorter orbits (in villosum the anterior margin is in line with the middle of P4); I1s with convergent tips (usually parallel in villosum); relatively short lower canine (in villosum the tip of the lower canine is at approximately the same level as the coronoid process); and absence of a frontal gap when cranium and mandible are in occlusion (in villosum there is a frontal gap delimited by C, I1–2, and i1–2). The subspecies C. d. vizottoi differs from C. scopaeum by having pale buff pelage, and larger size (Table 7). The p2 of C. d. vizottoi is larger, about ½ to ⅔ of the height of p4, while in C. scopaeum, p2 is approximately ¼ the height of p4. Geographic Variation and Phylogeography. A clade, here identified as scopaeum, contains six specimens of Chiroderma, of which five were analyzed morphologically (Fig. 16). The two specimens from México (TTU 109703 and TTU 110649) are phenotypically similar to the taxon we defined here as Chiroderma scopaeum, whereas specimens from Panamá (LSUMZ 25470), El Salvador (TTU 62462), and Guatemala (ROM 99703) have the diagnostic characters of Chiroderma salvini. The specimens morphologically diagnosed as salvini that nested in the scopaeum clade may represent a case of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), a relatively common phenomenon in recently-diverged taxa (Maddison & Knowles 2006). To test the ILS hypothesis between C. salvini and C. scopaeum, we recommend increasing the genetic sample of Chiroderma from western México, and obtaining additional genomic information such as single nucleotide polymorphisms. Also, it is important to note that no specimens, morphologically diagnosed as scopaeum, are nested in the salvini clade, which contains sequences from Central and South American specimens. Subspecies. C. scopaeum is monotypic. Remarks. Anderson (1960) mentioned a record of Chiroderma from Chihuahua, western México, that at the time would considerably increase the known distribution of the genus, suggesting an undescribed species for the region. Based on a larger sample size, Handley (1966a) described the subspecies Chiroderma salvini scopaeum, then considered a smaller variant of C. salvini salvini. In this study, we consider the morphological, genetic, and biogeographic evidence as sufficiently strong to treat scopaeum as a species distinct from salvini, instead of as a geographic variant, or subspecies. Natural History. Information on the diet of C. scopaeum is scarce. In Tahuacán, Puebla, one individual was observed visiting the flowers of the columnar cactus Pachycereus weberi (Pachyceraceae), but the bat was not covered in pollen (Valiente-Banuet et al. 1997). In Sinaloa, C. scopaeum was captured in mist nets set under fruiting fig trees. In Jalisco, mist nets over a stream and under a canopy formed by wild figs and other trees also caught C. scopaeum (Jones et al. 1972; Watkins et al. 1972). Specimens have been captured in altered landscapes, such as cornfields (Almazán-Catalán et al. 2009). Summarizing data from the literature, along with the specimens we examined, C. scopaeum appears to be seasonally polyestrous. Pregnancies occurred in January (Sinaloa), February (Jalisco), and June (Jalisco and Nayarit) (Jones et al. 1972; Watkins et al. 1972). Lactating females have been found in May (Morelos) and June (Nayarit and Jalisco) (Watkins et al. 1972). Females noted as non-reproductive were recorded in July (Chihuahua; Anderson 1972) and August (Colima; Wilson 1979). Specimens Examined (N = 35): México: Colima, La Sidra (TTU 61623), Pueblo Juárez (USNM 338711 [holotype of scopaeum]); Jalisco, 20 km SW Talpa de Allende (AMNH 254647), 9.3 km W Chapala (TTU 38049), 6.4 km NW Autlán de Navarro (TTU 109703), La Cumbre (TTU 40987); Morelos, Oaxtepec (USNM 559607); Nayarit, 12.9 km NE San Miguel del Zapote, 51.5 km W Mesa del Nayar (USNM 559608–559613), 13 km NE San Blas (TTU 110649), 5 km E El Venado (USNM 559614, 559615), 12.9 km E San Blas (TTU 6122), Arroyo La Taberna,, 3.2 km W Mesa del Nayar (USNM 511374–511377), 2.9 km NE (by road), Coapan (USNM 511380–511382), 2.3 km N (by road), El Tacote (USNM 508636), 3.2 km E Jalcotoán (USNM 523258, 523259), Mesa del Nayar (USNM 511378, 511379), Playa Novillero (USNM 553885); Oaxaca, 30 km NW Sala de Veja (AMNH 190006); Veracruz, Ojo de Agua del Rio Atoyac (TTU 9996–9999).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFungal Biology and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207