Phimenes arcuatus subsp. arcuatus Fabricius 1775
Bibliographic record
Abstract
arcuatus arcuatus (Fabricius) Vespa arcuata Fabricius 1775: 371 —“Nova Hollandia ” (London); 1781: 467; 1787, Mant. Ins. 1: 292.— Gmelin 1790: 2753.—Olivier 1792 [1791]: 670.— Fabricius 1793: 276.— Jurine, 1807: 171. Sphex arcuata; Christ 1791: 312 (translation of original description). Eumenes arcuata; Fabricius 1804: 287.—de Saussure 1852: 63 (New Guinea).— Smith 1857: 29 (cat.); 1859: 163 (Kei); 1861b: 126 (arcuatus; New Guinea; Batjan).—de Saussure 1862: 179 (arcuatus).— Smith 1864a: 37 (arcuatus; Misool;Waigeu); 1865: 87 (arcuatus; Salawati); 1871: 372 (cat.) [partim].— Maindron 1882: 272 (cat.; syns.: fulvipennis Smith, flavopicta Blanchard; varieties: blanchardi de Saussure, praslinia Guérin).— Froggatt 1892: 227 (arcuatus; cat.).— Kirby 1894: 108 (Damma).— Dalla Torre 1894: 18 (cat. [incorrectly “ arcuata (Fabr.) L.”]); 1904: 21 (cat.; syn.: fulvipennis Smith).— Rudow 1904a: 196 (arcuatus; nest; New Guinea).— Zavattari 1911: 2 (arcuatus; Nuova Olanda).— Cameron 1911: 194 (arcuatus; New Guinea).— Meade-Waldo 1912: 446 (arcuatus; New Guinea).—du Buysson 1913 [1911]: 230 (Aru; Kei).— Meade-Waldo 1916 [1915]: 8.— Bequaert 1928a: 61 (arcuatus; type is female); 1928: 169 (arcuatus; typical form in key).— Giordani Soika 1935: 133 (arcuatus; in subgenus Delta; syns.: formosanus Zimmermann, continentalis Zimmermann) [partim]; 1941: 229 (arcuatus; in subgenus Delta; key). Eumenes arcuata arcuate; Zimmermann 1931: 205, fig. 26 no. 4 (Qld.; New Britain; New Guinea).—van der Vecht 1959: 5 (key), 53, figs. 3g, 4 (35), 5n, 7 (35) (arcuatus; New Guinea; Biak; Salawati; Waigeu; Kei; Aru; Egum; Qld.: “Cape York, … Coen,” “Rocky Shrub, Mcllwraith Range,” Kuranda, “Palm Isl. to Cooktown,” “10 S Bowen,” Meringa, Mackay, Cooktown, Halifax, Kuranda); 1960: 113; 1961, Evolution 15: 469, figs. 1g, 4, 5. Delta arcuatus; Giordani Soika 1961b: 243.— Naumann 1993, in Naumann et al.: 180 (arcuatum; Qld.: “ 15 km NE by N Heathlands H. S.”; “widespread through northern Australia from the Kimberley region to Bowen”). Delta arcuata arcuata; Cardale 1985: 170 (cat.).— Brown 2009: 29 (N. T.: North Coast). Phi arcuatum arcuatum; Giordani Soika & Kojima 1988: 182 (Papua New Guinea). Phimenes arcuatus; Giordani Soika 1992: 41 (type of Phimenes, new genus).— Hermes et al. 2014: 456 (phylogenetic relationships). Phimenes arcuatus arcuatus; Borsato 1994 [1993]: 250 (Qld.: Cairns); 1994: 169 (N. T.: “dint. di Darwin,” Litchfield N. P.); 1996: 225 (arcuatum arcuatum; Qld.: “Nervey Range, Townsville,” “Pangola Stud, Spring Creek, 40 Km S. Townsville,” Fitzroy I.); 2003: 563 (N. T.: Darwin; Qld.: Mareeba).— Nugroho et al. 2012 [2011]: 110 (list).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".