MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6893738585 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5056445

Thinobius koreanus Lee & Yoo & Ahn 2021, sp. n.

2021· article· en· W6893738585 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIchthyology and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaQuadrate boneMandible (arthropod mouthpart)Apex (geometry)Fibrous jointArthropod mouthparts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thinobius koreanus Lee & Yoo sp. n. (Figs. 1B, 4–5) Description. Length 1.60–1.80 mm. Body flattened, surface pubescent; light brown to dark brown, head and abdomen dark brown, pronotum, elytra and antenna brown, mouthparts and legs light brown. Head. Almost as long as wide and slightly narrower than pronotum; widest across eyes; clypeus trapezoidal; eye moderate in size and rounded in lateral aspect, with large eye facet and interfacetal setae; temple well developed, diameter of eye slightly longer than temple; gular suture fused and broadly divergent at posterior part; neck well developed, transversely reticulate sculptures distinct, seta absent (Fig. 4B); antenna slender, moderately elongate, and pubescent; antennomere 1 longest, 3 shortest, 1–11 elongate (Fig. 4A). Mouthparts. Labrum transverse, lateral margin rounded, anterior margin slightly emarginate; mandible triangular, apex bifid with subapical tooth, prostheca and molar tooth well developed; maxillary palpus with four palpomeres, palpomere 1 transverse and small, 2 slightly dilated to apex, 3 largest, 2–3 with many setae, 4 short and slender; apical margin of 3 more than 2.0 times as wide as basal margin of 4; labial palpus with three elongate palpi, palpomere 1 with one long, one short seta and two pores, 2 with one long seta and one pore, 3 with few short sensilla at apex; mentum quadrate with two pairs of long macrosetae and many setae. Thorax. Pronotum transverse, width 0.29–0.30 mm, widest near half of length, surface pubescent with seven pairs of macrosetae and many setae; prosternum with one pair of long setae and a few short setae, apex of prosternal process sharp and elevated (Figs. 4C–D); scutellum an inverted triangle, anterior margin of scutellum emarginate, posterior part reticulate with a few setae and inverted triangle impression, impression about 1.6 times as wide as long, elytron elongate and pubescent; posterior margin with membranous lobe; hind wing present; mesoventral process slightly extended and pointed at apex; metaventral carina absent; metaventrite distinctly reticulate with two pairs of long macrosetae and many setae (Fig. 4E); all tibiae with one long macroseta in middle. Abdomen. Posterior margin of tergite VII with fringe of setae; posterior margin of tergite VIII emarginate; posterior margin of sternite VIII convex. Secondary sexual characteristics. Male tergite IX with ventral structs, struts shorter than other part, female gonocoxites present; female with one ring structure (Fig. 4F). Genitalia. Aedeagus oval (Fig. 5A) with serrated pattern in lateral aspect (Fig. 5B); paramere long and slender; spermatheca as in Fig. 5C. Type material. Holotype, 1 ♂, labeled as follows: ‘ KOREA: Gyeongbuk Prov., Pohang-si, Buk-gu, Cheongha-myeon, Cheongjin-ri, N36°10'38.73" E129°23'37.15" 17 m, 12 VII 2018, IS Yoo, JS Lee, JG Jung, in coarse sand/gravels on seashore, flotation’ ‘ Holotype, Thinobius koreanus Lee and Yoo, Desig. Jae-Seok Lee and In-Seong Yoo, 2021 ’ ‘ Deposited in the Chungnam National University Insect Collection, Korea’. Paratypes, 7 exx., same data as holotype, 5 exx., same data as holotype except for ‘ N36°10ʹ37.8 ʺE129°23ʹ38.0ʺ 9m, 27 VIII 2010, KJ Ahn, TK Kim, YH Kim, IS Yoo, JH Song, SG Lee, JH Jeon, under stones on seashore.’ Distribution. Korea. Remarks. This species is similar to T. marinus, but can be distinguished by the shape of antennomeres. Antennomeres 1–11 are elongate in Thinobius koreanus sp. n. (Fig. 4A), but 4–8 transverse in T. marinus. The new species is also similar to T. frizzelli from Canada and USA but can be distinguished by the shape of antennomeres. Antennomeres 4–10 are quadrate and 4–6 are almost same length in the new species (Fig. 4A), but 4–10 rounded form and 5 larger than 4 or 6 in T. frizzelli (Kincaid, 1961). All specimens were collected in the southern part of the Korean peninsula.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicIchthyology and Marine Biology→French-language works237,207→