MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6893738897 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3792997

Ochthephilum fracticorne

2008· article· en· W6893738897 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier UniversityNova Scotia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolarcticSalt marshHabitatNova scotiaFaunaMarsh

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ochthephilum fracticorne (Paykull, 1800) NEW BRUNSWICK: Albert Co.: Mary’s Point, 23.VIII.2003, C.G. Majka, coastal dunes; under flotsam, (1, CGMC). NOVA SCOTIA: Victoria Co.: South Harbour, 16.VI.1983, Y. Bousquet, sand beach, (1, CNC); Ingonish North Bay, 29.VI.1983, L. LeSage, salt marsh, pile of decaying vegetation, (1, CNC). Majka and Klimaszewski (2008) reported this species from New Brunswick. Its distribution in Atlantic Canada is shown in Fig. 13. Ochthephilum fracticorne has not been noted in Europe as a coastal species but rather is regarded as a synanthropic one found in fields, parks, litter, decomposing hay, and compost (Drugmand 1989). D.S. Chandler (pers. comm.) has recorded it coastal habitats in New Hampshire and the above records from New Brunswick and Nova Scotia indicate that it is at least an occasional inhabitant of such environments (Fig. 13). Ochthephilum jacquelini (Boieldieu, 1859), however, is a halobiont found exclusively in salt marshes in Great Britain (Hammond 2000). There is some uncertainty about the zoogeographic status of O. fracticorne. Campbell and Davies (1991) listed it as a Holarctic species but Drugmand (1989) treated it as a Palearctic species. Staphylininae

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMarine Biology and Ecology Research→French-language works237,207→