MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893744564 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4401586

Tagasta mizoramensis Gupta & Chandra & Yin 2020, sp. nov.

2020· article· en· W6893744564 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLobeFemurBasal (medicine)WingRidgeTransverse plane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tagasta mizoramensis sp. nov. (figs. 1 A–E, 2A–G) Material examine (4 specimens) Holotype: 1♀, INDIA, Mizoram, Dampa Wildlife Sanctuary, Telrei, 09.xi.1995 coll. M. S. Shishodia, Registration no. 31879/H5. Paratypes. 2♂, 1♀, same locality as holotype, Registration no. 31880/H5–31882/H5. Diagnosis: Tagasta mizoramensis sp. nov. differs from all species by its hind wing not red, dark. Descriptions. Female: Body medium, robust. Head short rounded, shorter than pronotum, without round white particles behind the eye; fastigium of vertex about as long as vertical diameter of eyes, longitudinally sulcated in middle; frontal ridge with low longitudinal sulcus; filiform antennae, inserted infront of lateral ocelli, reaching posterior margin of pronotum, length of basal segment shorter than width. Eyes long oval. Pronotum cylindrical, finely punctured, three transverse sulci present, prozona longer than metazona, median carina of pronotum distinct in metazona and indistinct in prozona, lateral carinae absent, the length of prozona about 1.7 times as long as the length of metazona, anterior margin of pronotum straight, posterior margin of pronotum arcuate, lateral lobe of pronotum angulated posterior region, without white granules on the lower margin. Prosternal tubercles rounded at anterior margin. Interspace of mesosternal lobe tetragonal, length larger than maximum width. Tegmina reaching up to 6 th abdominal segment, hind wings shorter than tegmina. Hind femur slender, its length 11 times its width, upper basal lobe of hind femur subequal the lower one, tip of lower kneelobe rounded. Posterior tibiae with 9 spines on inner side and 8 spines on outer side. Male: Body medium sized. Head shorter than pronotum. Antennae filiform extended beyond hind margin of pronotum, eyes oval. Pronotum cylindrical, finely punctured, with three transverse sulci, lateral carinae and mid carinae indistinct. Prosternal process tuberculate, apex pointed Tegmina narrow, apex reaching 7 th –8 th abdominal tergite. Hind femur slender, its length 6 times its width. Posterior tibiae with 9 spines on inner side and 8 spines on outer side. 10 th abdominal tergite with posterior margin triangularly excised in middle, supra-anal plate broad triangular, median area longitudinally raised. Subgenital plate conical, apically rounded. Circus conically expanded, apices truncated in lateral view, reaching beyond posterior margin of supra-anal plate. Colour: Body green-olivaceous. Eyes, dark brown. Antennae light brownish. Head dorsum part olivaceous, ventral dark yellow. Tegmina light green. Wings hyaline, dark. Fore and medina legs dark brownish, posterior femur yellowish green. Posterior tibiae blackish brown, Posterior tarsi reddish brown. Morphometry (mm): Female: Body length: 35.4; Antenna length: 13.2, Antenna 1 st segment length: 0.8, Width: 0.6; Mid segments length: 1.1, width: 0.4; compound eyes length (Dorsal view): 2.1, width: 1.4; Dorsal ovipositor valve length: 2.6, width: 0.8; Fore legs: femur length: 5.7, width: 1.1, tibiae length: 4.3, width: 0.7, first tarsal segment length: 0.7, IInd segment length: 0.5, IIIrd segment length: 1.4; claws length: 0.9; Med legs: femur length: 6.9, width: tibiae length: 4.2; Hind legs: femur length: 19.3, width: 2.9, tibiae length: 17.2, width: 0.6, Ist Tarsal segment length: 2.0, IInd length: 0.7, IIIrd length: 2.2, arolium length: 0.3, width: 0.8, claws length: 0.7; Pronotum length: 8.7, Prozona length: 5.5, metazona length: 3.2; Head length: 4.6; tegmen length: 16.1, width: 4.7; wings length: 11.2, width: 5.5. Male: Body length: 25.2; Head length: 4.4; Pronotum length: 6.7; Compound eye length (dorsal view): 1.8, width: 1.2; cerci length: 1.5, width: 0.2; Legs: fore legs: femur length: 3.8, width: 1.5 tibiae length: 3.9, width: 0.6; Mid legs: femur length: 5.9, width: 1.4; Hind legs: femur length: 15.2, width: 2.7, tibiae 13.3, width: 0.6. Etymology: The name of the species has been given after the type locality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSpider Taxonomy and Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207