Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key to species of Boethella 1. Malar space 0.5× basal width of mandible (Fig. 9)................................................... B. darlingi - Malar space obliterated, mandible margin contiguous with ventral edge of eye (Figs 4, 12, 15)........................ 2 2. Auxiliary carina of mesopleuron extending from anterior edge and joining epicnemial carina (Fig. 7)................... 3 - Auxiliary carina of mesopleuron not extending to epicnemial carina (Figs 1, 4, 18)................................. 4 3. Epicnemial carina extending dorsal to point of union of auxiliary carina by at least the length of auxiliary carina (Fig. 7); T4 predominantly brown, yellow laterally and sometimes with a yellow median longitudinal stripe or spot (Fig. 6).... B. curriei - Epicnemial carina extending dorsal to point of union of auxiliary carina by much less than the length of auxiliary carina (Fig. 12), or not extending at all; T4 entirely yellow or yellow with a trace of brown in apical 0.2 and with a longitudinal brown or brown and white region in median apical 0.3 (Fig. 10)............................................... B. guidottiae 4. Auxiliary carina of mesopleuron curving sharply at midpoint so it runs parallel to anterior edge of mesopleuron (Fig. 18); hind femur black (Fig. 16)...................................................................... B. jatai sp. nov. - Auxiliary carina of mesopleuron not curving sharply at midpoint; hind femur yellow or orange........................ 5 5. Hind tibia dark brown, except light brown at base (Fig. 2).............................................. B. canilae - Hind tibia basal 0.7 yellow, apical 0.3 brown (Fig. 14)................................................. B. hubleyi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.249 | 0.160 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".