MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893754115 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4337954

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) minckleyi Gardner & Gibbs 2020, sp. nov.

2020· article· en· W6893754115 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMargin (machine learning)Taxonomy (biology)Chirality (physics)Life history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) minckleyi sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 3197BF55-611C-4EE4-BC8B-4E133355826C Figs 3A, 64–66, 90J, 98B, 107B Diagnosis Females of Lasioglossum minckleyi sp. nov. can be recognized by the face short (length/width ratio ~0.8), frons and mesepisternum with coarse and crowded punctures (i =0 pd), clypeus with distinct apicolateral denticles, T1 anterior surface corarious, T2–4 with dark spiracular spots, metasomal terga lacking tomentum, and mesoscutum broad (length/width ratio usually ≤ 0.8). They are most similar to L. mesillense and L. imbriumbrae sp. nov. Both of these species usually have the frons and mesepisternum with finer or distinctly separated punctures at least in part, T1 anterior surface shiny, and metasomal terga with basolateral tomentum. Occasional specimens of L. mesillense lack some of these diagnostic characters, and are very difficult to distinguish from L. minckleyi sp. nov. Females of L. mesillense also have the mesoscutum longer (length/width ratio usually ± 0.84); this and the frons punctation seem to be the most reliable diagnostic characters. Males of L. minckleyi sp. nov. can be recognized by the face short (length/width ratio ~0.83) and covered in moderately dense tomentum below the ocelli, flagellomeres relatively short (F2 about 1.6 times as long as F1 and 1.25 times as long as broad), mesepisternum punctures dense (i <1 pd), metasomal terga lacking tomentum, T1–3 rims punctate basally, and clypeus apical margin and labrum usually orange. They are most similar to L. mesillense, L. austerum sp. nov., and L. imbriumbrae sp. nov. Males of L. mesillense have the flagellomeres relatively long (F2 about 2 times as long as F1 and 1.6 times as long as broad), mesepisternum more sparsely punctate (i= 1–2 pd), and metasomal terga sometimes with basolateral tomentum. Males of L. austerum sp. nov. have the face below ocelli covered in sparser tomentum and mesepisternum more sparsely punctate (i ≤ 1 pd). Males of L. imbriumbrae sp. nov. have T1–3 rims impunctate and clypeus apical margin and labrum reddish brown to black. Etymology The specific epithet minckleyi is a dedication to Robert L. Minckley (University of Rochester), who collected the vast majority of currently known specimens. An appropriate translation would be Minckley’s sweat bee. Material examined Holotype MEXICO – Sonora • ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, 28 km E of Agua Prieta, Hay Hollow riparian site; [31.31° N, 109.25° W]; 25 Aug. 2000; R. Minckley and A. Romero leg.; PCYU. [Verbatim label: MEXICO: Sonora, Rancho San Bernardino,28kmE Agua Prieta 25Aug2000 Hay Hollow riparian Site / R Minckley, A Romero / ex. blue pan trap 003025 // 1849C01 // HOLOTYPE / Lasioglossum (Dialictus) minckleyi Gardner and Gibbs] Paratypes MEXICO – Sonora • 1 ♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3217° N, 109.2583° W; 25 Jul. 2000; R. Minckley leg.; PCYU • 2 ♀♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3097° N, 109.2542° W; 19 Aug. 2003; A. Nelson leg.; PCYU • 1 ♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3322° N, 109.2703° W; 3 Aug. 2001; R.L. Minckley leg.; RLM • 1 ♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.31° N, 109.2778° W; 11 Sep. 2001; R.L. Minckley leg.; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho Puerta Blanca, Pollination Site 26, Opuntia, Bulldozer, Rancho Puerta Blanca; 31.32222° N, 109.07972° W; 24 May 2008; ex Opuntia engelmannii; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.31° N, 109.2536° W; 25 Aug. 2001; R. Minckley leg.; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, 28 km E of Agua Prieta, cienega transect; [31.31° N, 109.25° W]; 27 Jul. 2000; K. Toal leg.; RLM • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; PCYU • 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Bosque dry, Site 4; 31.30972° N, 109.27778° W; 19 Aug. 2003; RLM • 3 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Bosque wet, Site 1; 31.33194° N, 109.27083° W; 10 Aug. 2006; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Bosque wet, Site 6, Transect 3; 31.32957° N, 109.25462° W; 27 Jul. 2007; RLM • 3 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Bosque wet, Site 7; 31.30972° N, 109.25417° W; 19 Aug. 2003; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Bosque wet, Site 7, Transect 2; 31.31007° N, 109.25348° W; 26 Jul. 2000; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 12 Aug. 2002; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Cienega house; 31.33098° N, 109.2676° W; 1 Apr. 2006; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, field, Site 3, Transect 3; 31.32222° N, 109.27722° W; 12 Aug. 2002; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, grassland, Site 3; 31.30222° N, 109.26694° W; 12 Aug. 2006; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Pollination Site 21, Sphaeralcea, Pond 100 m E of main gate; 31.31583° N, 109.26861° W; 8 Aug. 2006; ex Lycium andersonii; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 18 Aug. 2006; ex Larrea tridentata; RLM • 3 ♀♀, 1 ♂; same location as for preceding; 10 Aug. 2007; ex Sphaeralcea laxa; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Pollination Site 22, Sphaeralcea, field 3; 31.32222° N, 109.27778° W; 6 Aug. 2006; ex Argemone pleiacantha; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Pollination Site 27, Horse Corral, 70 m N of main ranch house; 31.32556° N, 109.26667° W; 9 Sep. 2007; ex Sphaeralcea laxa; RLM • 8 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, quarry, gravel pit; 31.31964° N, 109.26926° W; 19 Aug. 2003; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, roadside E of quarry; 31.31996° N, 109.26848° W; 19 Aug. 2003; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, roadside W of quarry; 31.31948° N, 109.2701° W; 18 Aug. 2003; RLM • 3 ♀♀; same location as for preceding; 19 Aug. 2003; RLM • 3 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Riparian, Site 1, Transect 1; 31.33347° N, 109.2601° W; 16 Aug. 2000; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 10 Aug. 2006; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 22 Jul. 2007; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Riparian, Site 2; 31.33194° N, 109.25833° W; 20 Aug. 2003; ex Baccharis sarothroides; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 20 Aug. 2003; RLM • 4 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Riparian, Site 4; 31.32972° N, 109.25583° W; 20 Aug. 2003; RLM. UNITED STATES – Arizona • 1 ♂; Cochise Co., Benson; [31.97° N, 110.29° W]; 1091 m a.s.l.; 14– 15 Sep. 1974; E.G. and J.M. Linsley leg.; ex Helianthus annuus; CUIC • 2 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino National Wildlife Refuge, Black Draw, Riparian Site 2; [31.34° N, 109.26° W]; 16 Aug. 2000; K. Toal leg.; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR; 31.3344° N, 109.2681° W; 3 Aug. 2001; R.L. Minckley leg.; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR; [31.34° N, 109.26° W]; 27 Aug. 2001; R. Minckley leg.; RLM • 4 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Bosque dry, Site 7; 31.34118° N, 109.25813° W; 6 Aug. 2003; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Bosque dry, Site 7, Transect 2; 31.34168° N, 109.25825° W; 30 Jul. 2004; RLM • 5 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Bosque wet, Site 2; 31.33633° N, 109.2673° W; 7 Aug. 2003; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Bosque wet, Site 2, Transect 2; 31.33627° N, 109.26752° W; 31 Jul. 2004; RLM • 4 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Bosque wet, Site 3; 31.33517° N, 109.26653° W; 7 Aug. 2003; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Bosque wet, Site 3, Transect 2; 31.33527° N, 109.2668° W; 11 Oct. 2002; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 15 Aug. 2005; RLM • 8 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Bosque wet, Site 4; 31.334° N, 109.2372° W; 5 Aug. 2003; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Bosque wet, Site 4, Transect 1; 31.33693° N, 109.24361° W; 26 Jul. 2007; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, field, nr Bathroom, Bee Diversity; 31.3411° N, 109.27048° W; 15 Oct. 2002; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, field, Site 5, Transect 3; 31.33417° N, 109.26778° W; 27 Jul. 2007; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, field, Site 6; 31.33867° N, 109.2719° W; 8 Aug. 2003; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, field, Site 6, Transect 1; 31.33417° N, 109.26833° W; 11 Aug. 2005; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, field, Site 6, Transect 4; 31.33444° N, 109.26806° W; 3 Jul. 2002; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, field, Site 8; 31.33765° N, 109.26068° W; 6 Aug. 2003; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 6 Apr. 2006; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Grassland, Site 2, Transect 3; 31.3358° N, 109.2702° W; 27 Jul. 2007; RLM • 3 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Grassland, Site 4; 31.33495° N, 109.25314° W; 5 Aug. 2003; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Grassland, Site 4, Transect 1; 31.33487° N, 109.2529° W; 26 Jul. 2007; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Grassland, Site 5; 31.33683° N, 109.25308° W; 5 Aug. 2003; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Grassland, Site 5, Transect 4; 31.3385° N, 109.25308° W; 26 Jul. 2007; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Grassland, Site 8; 31.34254° N, 109.27449° W; 12 May 2006; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Mesa de la Avanzada, Bee diversity; 31.34147° N, 109.27278° W; 15 Aug. 2002; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 15 Oct. 2002; RLM • 1 ♂; Pima Co., Greaterville Rd.; 31.7864° N, 110.8231° W; 1320 m a.s.l.; 8 Jul. 2010; Yanega leg.; ex Condalia; UCRC • 1 ♀; Pinal Co., 8 km SE of San Manuel; 32.5974° N, 110.5388° W; 15 Apr. 2014; R.G. Laport leg.; ex Larrea tridentata; RLM • 1 ♀; Yavapai Co., Montezuma Castle; [34.61° N, 111.84° W]; 25 Jun. 1973; H. Nagase leg.; LACM • 1 ♀; 30 km E of Douglas; 31.3383° N, 109.2683° W; 3 Sep. 2000; R. Minckley leg.; ex Baccharis sarothroides; RLM • 1 ♂; 6 mi. SE of Patagonia; [31.48° N, 110.83° W]; 26 Jul. 1962; Werner, Bequaert and Noller leg.; ex Condalia lycioides and Baccharis salicina; CUIC • 1 ♂; Arivaca; [31.58° N, 111.33° W]; 12 Jul. 1940; R.H. Beamer leg.; SEMC • 1 ♂; Tucson; [32.22° N, 110.97° W]; 14 Jul. 1950; J.G. Rozen leg.; SEMC. – New Mexico • 1 ♂; Luna Co., 32 km E of Deming; [32.27° N, 107.42° W]; 1300 m a.s.l.; 7 Aug. 1998; R. Minckley and K. Toal leg.; RLM. Description Female COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma blue-green to golden-green; clypeus apical colour black, reddish brown, or orange; labrum reddish brown to orange; mandible oran

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207