MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893760530 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3717194

Atheta (Hydrosmectomorpha) vincenti Webster and Klimaszewski 2018, new species

2018· article· en· W6893760530 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeBaySAINTBarnacleTaxonFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atheta (Hydrosmectomorpha) vincenti Webster and Klimaszewski, new species (Fig. 24–31) Holotype (male). Canada, New Brunswick, Saint John Co., Fundy Trail Parkway, 45.4226°N, 65.4055°W, 16.VIII.2009, R.P. Webster, coll. // Big Salmon River, river margin among algae-covered gravel and cobblestones, sun-exposed area, (CNC). Paratypes. Canada, New Brunswick, Saint John Co., Fundy Trail Parkway, 45.4226°N, 65.4055°W, 16.VIII.2009, R.P. Webster, coll. // Big Salmon River, river margin among algae covered gravel and cobblestones, sun-exposed area (LFC) 1 female, (RWC) 3 males, 5 females; New Brunswick, Carleton Co., Belleville, Meduxnekeag Valley Nature Preserve, 46.1897°N, 67.6781°W, 31.VII.2009, R.P. Webster, coll. // Rich Appalachian hardwood forest, margin of shaded spring-fed brook among gravel on firm sand/clay/gravel mix (RWC) 1 male; New Brunswick, Madawaska Co., Baker Brook, 47.29719°N, 68.51226°W, 26.VII.2006, R. Capozi & R. Webster, coll. // Saint John River island, among cobblestones near water (RWC) 1 male, 1 female. Etymology. This species is named in honor of Vincent Webster who collected many aleocharine specimens in New Brunswick representing new taxa and new provincial records as well as many other new records from other families. Diagnosis. Body subparallel, flattened, length 3.2–3.8 mm; colour dark brown to almost black, with legs and elytra, except for scutellar region, paler, yellowish-brown (Fig. 24); integument moderately glossy, forebody with fine, moderately dense punctation and faint meshed microsculpture; head slightly narrower than pronotum, eyes large and slightly protruding; antennae moderately robust, all antennomeres distinctly elongate (Fig. 24); pronotum widest at apical third (0.59 mm), (Fig. 24); elytra flat- tened, distinctly elongate, at suture about as long as pronotum, broader than pronotum (0.73 mm at shoulders); abdomen subparallel, widest at apical third. Male. Apical margin of tergite VIII obliquely produced laterally, with two lobe-like processes forming a variable, obtuse angular emargination medially (Fig. 26); sternite VIII moderately deeply emarginate, apical margin broadly truncate, rounded laterally (Fig. 27); tubus of median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view moderately wide, ventral margin straight to apical third, then moderately curved ventrad to narrow apex (Fig. 25). Female. Apical margin of tergite VIII obtusely produced laterally, truncate medially (Fig. 28); apical margin of sternite VIII obliquely produced, broadly rounded apically (Fig. 29); spermatheca short, capsule club-shaped with shallow apical invagination, stem narrow and straight or slightly sinuate (Fig. 30, 31). Distribution. Origin: Nearctic. CANADA: NB. Habitat and collection data. Habitat. Most specimens are from a cobblestone river margin (clear, fast flowing medium-sized river). Adults were found among algae-covered gravel and cobblestones in a sun-exposed area near flowing water. A few were collected from among cobblestones along a large river; one individual was collected from the margin of a shaded spring-fed brook among gravel on firm sand/ clay/gravel mix flowing into the Meduxnekeag River. Collecting period. VII–VIII. Collecting method. Hand collecting from among cobblestones near rivers and streams.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementFrench-language works237,207