Galendromus (Galendromus) occidentalis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Galendromus (Galendromus) occidentalis (Nesbitt, 1951) Typhlodromus occidentalis Nesbitt, 1951: 29. Material examined. USA: one female (HAL 095F371) from Prunus persica (Rosaceae), 25 Sept 2006; six females (HAL 095F350) from M. pumila (Rosaceae), 9 Nov 2006; one female (HAL 095F455) from M. pumila (Rosaceae), 15 Nov 2006; two females (HAL 095F456) from M. pumila (Rosaceae), 15 Nov 2006; four females (HAL 095F458) from M. pumila (Rosaceae), 15 Nov 2006; two females (HAL 095F459) from M. pumila (Rosaceae), 15 Nov 2006; two females (TAL 095F457) from Prunus persica (Rosaceae), 15 Nov 2006; four females (HAL 095G068) from M. pumila (Rosaceae), 30 Nov 2006; four females (HAL 095G069) from M. pumila (Rosaceae), 30 Nov 2006; three females (HAL 095G070) from M. pumila (Rosaceae), 1 Dec 2006; seven females (HAL 095G079) from M. pumila (Rosaceae), 7 Dec 2006; four females (HAL 095G081) from M. pumila (Rosaceae), 7 Dec 2006; seven females (HAL 095G799) from M. pumila (Rosaceae), 19 Dec 2006; nine females (HAL 095G800) from M. pumila (Rosaceae), 25 Dec 2006; three females (QAR 101H022) from P. persica (Rosaceae), 19 Sept 2011; one female (HAL 101B056) from P. persica (Rosaceae), 21 Sept 2011; one female (QAR 101H024) from P. persica (Rosaceae), 22 Sept 2011; one female (QAR 101H025) from P. persica (Rosaceae), 22 Sept 2011; one female (QAR 101H026) from P. persica (Rosaceae), 22 Sept 2011; three females (HAL 101B059) from P. persica (Rosaceae), 28 Sept 2011; one female (QAR 102H034) from P. persica (Rosaceae), 14 Aug 2013; one female (QAR 102H046) from P. persica (Rosaceae), 12 Sept 2013; one female (QAR 102H047) from P. persica (Rosaceae), 12 Sept 2013; one female (QAR 102H053) from P. persica (Rosaceae), 26 Sept 2013. Previous records. Africa: South Africa (Denmark 1982). Asia: China (Wu et al. 1997), Israel (Denmark 1982), Jordan (Allawi 1991), South Korea (Ryu & Lee 1992), Taiwan (Chant & Yoshida-Shaul 1984). Europe: Austria (El- Borolossy 1989), Greece (Ragusa Di Chiara et al. 1995), Netherlands (Hoying & Croft 1977), Russia (Denmark 1982). North America: Canada (Nesbitt 1951), Mexico (Denmark & Evans 2011), USA (Cunliffe & Baker 1953). Oceania: Australia (Whitney & James 1996), New Zealand (Collyer 1964b). South America: Chile (Prado 1991), Venezuela (Aponte & McMurtry 1993). Remarks. The species is distributed worldwide (Demite et al. 2020). Denmark (1982) reported species distribution in Taiwan without recording specimen information. Chant & Yoshida-Shaul (1984) reported the species to be distributed in Taiwan based on one female specimen collected in 1950. Lo et al. (1986) reported that the species was introduced to Taiwan but could not be kept in laboratory. All specimens were collected on peaches and apples from the United States. The species has favorable efficacy for use in orchards. EPPO (2020) listed this species as a commercially used biological control agent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".