Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cryptodifflugia Penard, 1890 Shell oval, egg-shaped, pyriform with a short neck, circular or oval cross-section, with adhering foreign particles or smooth surface, colorless, yellow or brown, composed of an outer proteinaceous material usually lined, aperture terminal, circular or oval. Pseudopods are in the form of ectoplasmic anastomosing reticulolobopods. Type species. Cryptodifflugia oviformis Penard, 1890. Ecology. Most of the species of the genus Cryptodifflugia are freshwater and dwell in lake sediments and on a surface of submerged water vegetation. They also can be found in various terrestrial biotopes such as Sphagnum mosses in wetlands, wet green mosses on soils and rocks, forest litter, sometimes in the rhizosphere. Few species inhabit interstitial spaces in marine sands (Golemansky 1970, 1979, 1981), i.e. Cryptodifflugia brevicolla, C. lanceolata, C. paludosa, C. psammophila. Most of the species are rarely detected in field samples. Few of them, namely C. compressa, C. crenulata, C. oviformis, C. oviformis f. fusca, C. sacculus are cosmopolitic and may form dominant set of communities. Geographical distribution. Species of the genus Cryptodifflugia are found in Nearctic, Palaearctic, Africotropical, Indomalayan, Australian, Neotropical, Oceania Realms, and particularly in Africa, Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czech Republic, England, Holland, Hungary, Germany, Finland, France, India, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, Japan, Sumatra, USA, Vietnam.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".