MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6893773984 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3791132

Schistoglossa campbelli Klimaszewski 2009, sp. n.

2009· article· en· W6893773984 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest ServiceNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpermathecaAedeagusQueen (butterfly)HookDorsumKeel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schistoglossa campbelli Klimaszewski, sp. n. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: CE41CAEC-871C-47BB-ACD5-06CB820CC706 Figs 2, 17–24, Map 2 Holotype (male): CANADA, B.C. [British Columbia], Queen Charlotte Is., 8.8 km SW Tow Hill, J.M. Campbell; 22.VIII.1983, 83–108, treading Sphagnum & Carex at edge of marsh (CNC). Paratypes: CANADA, B.C. [British Columbia], Queen Charlotte Is., 8.8 km SW Tow Hill, J.M. Campbell; 22.VIII.1983, 83–108, treading Sphagnum & Carex at edge of marsh (CNC) 2 males, 4 females, 6 sex?, (LFC) 1 male, 1 female, 1 sex? Etymology. This species in named for J.M. Campbell of the former Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, collector of the original series. Gender masculine. Diagnosis. Body length 2.0– 2.4 mm, body moderately broad and subparallel, approximately uniformly dark brown, with tarsi or entire legs paler, moderately glossy and moderately densely pubescent (Fig. 2); antennae slim, articles 5–10 slightly transverse (Fig. 2); tempora each as long as two and a half times the maximal diameter of eye (Fig. 2); median lobe of aedeagus moderately broad, venter of tubus arcuate (Fig. 19), apical sclerites of internal sac V-shaped in dorsal view (Fig. 18); spermatheca S-shaped with capsule spherical apically and tubular basally, and with small apical invagination, stem moderately narrow and strongly sinuate (Fig. 22). I 50° 0' 0" W I 40° 0' 0" W 50° 0' 0" N I 30° 0' 0" W I 20° 0' 0" W Map 2. Collection localities in Canada of S. campbelli. First record of the genus Schistoglossa Kraatz from Canada... 57 22 0.2 mm Ι7 Ι8 Ι9 20 2Ι 23 24 Figures Ι7–24. Schistoglossa campbelli: Ι7 paramere Ι8 median lobe of aedeagus in dorsal view Ι9 median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view 20 male tergite 8 2Ι male sternite 8 22 spermatheca 23 female tergite 8 24 female sternite 8. Description. Body length 2.0– 2.4 mm, width 0.4 mm, approximately uniformly dark brown with slightly paler tip of abdomen and legs (Fig. 2); integument with weak microsculpture, sculpticells irregularly hexagonal, pubescence short, except slightly longer on head and abdomen, yellowish-brown in artificial light, moderately dense. Head slightly elongate, rounded posteriorly, weakly carinate basally, tempora as long as two and a half times the maximal diameter of eye as seen from above (Fig. 2); antennae slim with articles 5–10 slightly transverse (Fig. 2); pronotum moderately transverse, broadly rounded laterally and posteriorly, broadest in basal half, pubescence directed anteriorly on apical fourth of the midline and posteriorly and obliquely laterally elsewhere (Fig. 2); elytra moderately transverse, and slightly broadened posteriorly, hind margin sinuate, pubescence directed straight posteriad (Fig. 2); abdomen parallelsided, three basal tergites deeply impressed basally (Fig. 2). Male. Median lobe of the aedeagus moderately broad and flattened, venter of tubus arcuate with apex produced ventrally (Fig. 19), apical sclerites of internal sac V-shaped in dorsal view (Fig. 18); paramere as illustrated (Fig. 17); tergite 8 transverse and broadly emarginate apically, apical margin feebly toothed and with two large lateral teeth (Fig. 20); sternite 8 elongate and rounded posteriorly, slightly pointing medially, antecostal suture straight (Fig. 21). Female. Spermatheca S-shaped with capsule spherical apically and tubular basally, and with small apical invagination, stem moderately narrow and strongly sinuate (Fig. 22). Tergite and sternite 8 as illustrated (Figs 23, 24). Bionomics. Adults were captured by treading Sphagnum and Carex at edge of marsh in August. Geographic distribution (Map 2). Known only from the Queen Charlotte Islands of British Columbia, Canada. Comments. Schistoglossa campbelli has a median lobe of the aedeagus and spermatheca similar to those of S. hampshirensis and S. pseudocampbelli to which it is probably closely related. Schistoglossa pseudocampbelli Klimaszewski & Webster, sp. n. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 454AF461-DF44-4B14-993D-5FB2163029EB Figs 3, 25–32, Map 3 Holotype (female): CANADA, New Brunswick, York Co., Charters Settlement, 45.8267°N, 66.7343°W, 21.V.2006, sedge fen, treading sedge hummocks into water, R.P. Webster (LFC). Paratypes: New Brunswick: York Co., Charters Settlement, 45.8267°N, 66.7343°W, 21.IV.2005, 21.IV.2006, R.P. Webster, coll., Carex marsh, in sphagnum hummocks (LFC) 1 male; (RWC) 2 females; Charters Settlement, 45.8267°N, 66.7343°W, 16.IV.2005, 21.IV.2006, R.P. Webster, coll., Carex marsh, in sphagnum hummocks (RWC) 1 female; Charters Settlement, 45.8340°N, 66.7240°W, 17.VI.2007, R.P. Webster, coll., regenerating mixed forest in small marsh, sweeping foliage of Carex species (RWC) 1 female; Charters Settlement, 45.8404°N, 66.7360°W, medium-sized brook partially shaded by alders, brook margin among cobblestones and gravel (RWC) 1 female; Mazerolle Settlement, 45.8729°N, 66.8311°W, 9.IV.2006, R.P. Webster, margin of stream [through former (drained) beaver pond], in litter at base of eastern white cedar (RWC) 1 female; near Mazerolle Settlement, 45.8987°N, 66.7903°W, 9.IV.2006, R.P. Webster, coll., marsh [mostly grasses] with scattered alders, sifting grass and sphagnum at base of alder (RWC) 1 female; 1.5 km N of Durham Bridge at Nashwaak River, 46.1408°N, 66.6179°W, 15.VI.2008, R.P. Webster, river margin, among cobblestones near outflow of brook [under alders] (RWC) 1 female. Etymology. The specific name, pseudocampbelli, is an adjective derived from the prefix pseudo added to the name campbelli, reflecting close genital similarities between the two species. Gender masculine. Diagnosis. Body length 2.7–2.9 mm, body narrowly subparallel, approximately uniformly dark brown, with legs and antennal bases paler, moderately glossy and moderately densely pubescent (Fig. 3); antennae with articles 5–10 slightly transverse (Fig. 3); tempora each as long as approximately three times the maximal diameter of eye as seen from above (Fig. 3); median lobe of aedeagus moderately broad, venter of tubus almost straight (Fig. 27), apical sclerites of internal sac V-shaped in dorsal view (Fig. 26); spermatheca L-shaped, with capsule tubular, stem moderately narrow and approximately straight (Fig. 30). Description. Body length 2.7–2.9 mm, width 0.4 mm, approximately uniformly dark brown with slightly paler legs and antennal bases (Fig. 3); integument with microsculpture well pronounced, sculpticells irregularly hexagonal, pubescence short, except for slightly longer on head and abdomen, yellowish brown in artificial light, moderately dense. Head slightly elongate, rounded, feebly carinate basally, tempora as long as approximately three times the maximal diameter of an eye (Fig. 3); antennae with articles 1–3 strongly elongate and 5–10 moderately transverse (Fig. 3); pronotum transverse, broadly rounded laterally and posteriorly, broadest in basal half, pubescence directed anteriorly on apical third of the midline and obliquely laterally elsewhere (Fig. 3); elytra as long as pronotum at suture, strongly transverse, subparallel, hind margin slightly sinuate, pubescence directed straight posteriad (Fig. 3); abdomen parallel-sided, four basal tergites strongly impressed basally (Fig. 3 ). Male. Median lobe of the aedeagus moderately broad and flattened, venter of tubus approximately straight with apex narrow (Fig. 27), apical sclerites of internal sac V-shaped in dorsal view (Fig. 26); paramere as illustrated (Fig. 25); tergite 8 transverse and broadly emarginate apically, apical margin feebly crenulate and with two large lateral teeth (Fig. 28); sternite 8 elongate and rounded posteriorly, slightly pointed medially, antecostal suture slightly pointed medially (Fig. 29). Female. Tergite 8 truncate apically and slightly emarginate medially (Fig. 31); sternite 8 broadly rounded apically and slightly pointed medially (Fig. 32). Spermatheca L-shaped, with tubular capsule, stem narrow and feebly sinuate and twisted posteriorly (Fig. 30). Bionomics. Like other members of this genus, this species was most commonly captured in marshes or near wetlands. Adults were captured in Carex marshes in sphagnum hummocks, by treading sedge hummocks into water, sweeping foliage in Carex marsh, in grass and sphagnum at the base of alder in a marsh with grasses and alders, 60 Jan Klimaszewski, Reginald Webster & Karine Savard / ZooKeys 22: 45–79 (2009) 30 0.2 mm 25 26 27 28 29 3Ι 32 Figures 25–32. Schistoglossa pseudocampbelli: 25 paramere 26 median lobe of aedeagus in dorsal view 27 median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view 28 male tergite 8 29 male sternite 8 30 spermatheca 3Ι female tergite 8 32 female sternite 8. 60° 0' 0" W 50° 0' 0" N 70° 0' 0" W Map 3. Collection localities in Canada of S. pseudocampbelli. and along stream margins among cobblestones under alders or in litter. Adults were collected in April, May, and June. Geographic distribution (Map 3). Known only from New Brunswick, Canada. Comments. Schistoglossa pseudocampbelli has genital structures similar to those of S. campbelli and S. brunswickensis and is probably closely related to these species. Schistoglossa brunswickensis Klimaszewski & Webster, sp. n. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: B248D56C-8C67-4617-A651-7E1A331AA7D9 Figs 4, 33–42, Map 4 Holotype (female): CANADA, New Brunswick, York Co., Rt. 645 at Beaver Brook, 45.6860°N, 66.8669°W, 3.V.2008, R.P. Webster coll., Carex marsh

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicParasite Biology and Host Interactions→French-language works237,207→