MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6893774522 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4763865

Nemoura sahlbergi Morton 1896

2018· article· en· W6893774522 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType localityHolotypeDorsumConsistency (knowledge bases)Basal (medicine)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nemoura sahlbergi Morton, 1896 (Figs. 53‒84) http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid: Plecoptera.speciesfile.org: TaxonName:6326 Nemoura sahlbergi Morton 1896:56. Holotype ♂, Type locality – Utsjoki, Lake Enara, Finland Nemoura sahlbergi: Claassen 1940:63 Nemoura trispinosa: Ricker 1944:177. In part Nemoura sahlbergi: Brinck 1952:104 Nemoura sahlbergi: Zhiltzova 1964:187 Nemoura sahlbergi: Meinander 1965:17 Nemoura sahlbergi: Illies 1966:212. Nemoura rickeri Jewett, 1971:190. Type locality – Cache Creek, 19 mi E Eureka, Glenn Highway, Alaska. New synonym (Paratype ♂ examined) Nemoura sahlbergi: Lillehammer 1972b:157 Nemoura sahlbergi: Benedetto 1973:20 Nemoura sahlbergi: Zwick 1973a:340 Nemoura sahlbergi problematica: Zwick 1973b:162. Type locality – Diamond Range, Kangwon Province, People’s Republic of Korea. Nomen dubium Zwick 2010 Nemoura sahlbergi: Lillehammer 1974a:85 Nemoura rickeri: Dosdall & Lehmkuhl 1979:34 Nemoura rickeri: Stewart & Oswood 2006:78 Distribution. Canada: MB, NT, NU, SK, YK. Europe: Baltic States, Finland, Norway, Sweden. Mongolia. Russia East, Russia North. USA: AK (DeWalt et al. 2018). Diagnosis. Cercus. Highly variable. Male cerci are sclerotized laterally and terminate in either one (Figs. 54–57, 59) or two (Figs. 53, 58, 60) produced, curved spines that vary in length, curvature, and degree of tapering, plus a third unit (= outer spine) that tapers little and is typically crenulated distally. Epiproct. Males exhibit consistency with epiproct shape and characteristics across the Holarctic with only minor differences between individuals. In lateral aspect, the basal cushion occupies the anterior ca. ½ and is separated from the dorsal sclerite by smooth lateral areas (Figs. 61–68). The lateral areas are consistently recurved slightly over the distal medial portion of the basal cushion. The dorsal sclerite is open apically, exposing paired, rounded apical prongs bearing scale-like ridges, terminating laterally into one or two stout, grooved lateral spines (Figs. 69–76). The apical prongs are positioned either ca. parallel (Figs. 82, 84) or ca. diagonal to the ridges (Figs. 77–81, 83). Comments. The synonymy of N. rickeri with N. sahlbergi has been suggested previously (e.g. Lillehammer 1972b; Boumans & Brittain 2012). Jewett (1971) noted in his description of N. rickeri that this species “…is similar to the rare northern European Nemoura sahlbergi …”. Lillehammer (1972a, his Fig. 29.4) illustrated several different cercal forms from Norway, showing variability in the curved and outer spines. The epiproct apical prongs studied herein from the Northwest Territories (Fig. 78), Alaska (Fig. 80), Norway (Fig. 82), and Mongolia (Fig. 84) are consistent with illustrations or images in Lillehammer (1972a, his Fig. 31.3; Norway), Boumans (2011, his Fig. 2; Norway) and Judson & Nelson (2012, their Fig. 187; Mongolia). Geographic notes. Holarctic: Scandinavia east across Asia; in North America from Alaska east to Nunavut and Manitoba. South in Europe to Latvia and in eastern Asia south to Mongolia and far eastern Siberia. South in North America to the treeline in the Saskatchewan River Basin in Manitoba and Saskatchewan. Additional notable references include Rauser (1968), Lillehammer (1972a, 1974, 1985, 1988), Burton (1984), Teslenko & Bazova (2009), Zhou et al. (2010), Zwick (2010), Boumans (2011), Boumans & Brittain (2012), and Judson & Nelson (2012).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology→French-language works237,207→