Zerconopsini Makarova & Marchenko & Lindquist 2021, tribe n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Zerconopsini tribe n. Type genus: Zerconopsis Hull, 1918. Diagnosis. Adult dorsal shield entire, often fully covering body dorsum, with or without lateral incisions, its setae mostly simple but usually some (1–8 pairs) paddle-shaped, rarely setae j 1, z 1 and often seta J 5 serrated or pilose. Sternal or sternitigenital shield consolidated with endopodal sclerites between coxae I–II and II–III but usually not connected with free endopodal strips between coxae III–IV. Female with ventrianal shield bearing 1–6 pairs of opisthogastric setae but never expansive enough to include metapodal platelets and setae JV 1; rarely, broad anal shield present bearing only three circumanal setae (Iphidonopsis). Peritreme long, its margins often crenulate. Subcapitulum with deutosternum wide or of moderate width; hypostomatic setae hp -1 and usually hp -3 elongated, often whip-like, 2–5 times longer than distance between them. Palp tarsus without distinct macroseta but apically with two distinct sensillae—large erect one with truncated tip, and curved “S”-like sensilla (Fig. 10). Palp trochanter internal seta whip-like, often much (3–6 times) longer than external seta (as an exception, 1.5 times in one undescribed Zerconopsis species). Male spermatodactyl of different length, tube-like, sometimes with membranous frenulum. Tarsus I with or without claws. Genu III usually plesiomorphically with eight setae (pv -1 present); tarsi II–IV each with dorso-proximal setae ad -2, pd -2 elongated, curved; males of few Zerconopsis species have ventral seta mv on tarsus II modified, thickened and attenuated. Genera included: Zerconopsis, Xenoseius, Iphidonopsis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".