MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893788485 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5099326

Gonatocerus (Cosmocomoidea) coxalis

2010· article· en· W6893788485 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlanarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeParatypeType (biology)Structure type

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gonatocerus (Cosmocomoidea) coxalis (Ogloblin, 1959) (Figs 273–276) Lymaenon (Cosmocomoidea) coxalis Ogloblin 1959b: 51 –53. Type locality: San Mateo, Esmeraldas, Ecuador. Gonatocerus (Cosmocomoidea) coxalis (Ogloblin): De Santis 1979: 367 (catalog). Gonatocerus coxalis (Ogloblin): Yoshimoto 1990: 40 (listed in ater species group). Lymaenon coxalis Ogloblin: Loiácono et al. 2005: 17 (type information; types incorrectly listed as presumably missing). Type material examined. Parts of holotype or/and paratype female(s) [MLPA] on slide labeled [ip]: “(Cosmocomoidea) Lymaenon coxalis A. Ogl. ♀♀ San Mateo, Esmeraldas Ecuador, J. Förster 14–VI–1956.”. According to the original description the species was described from two females. The mounting medium on the original slide (Fig. 4) was so dark that parts of the two poorly preserved, fragmented specimens were hardly visible, so in the course of this study they were remounted into Canada balsam under five coverslips, as follows: 1) head; 2) two forewings, one incomplete and the other split in two parts; 3) two fragmented antennae (F8 of one of them missing); 4) body and fragmented leg segments; 5) a fragment of a forewing. It appears that most of the parts belong to just one specimen, and the only remaining part of the second specimen may be the fragment of a forewing, although it is also possible that these fragments belonged to both specimens of the type series. It is also impossible to determine whether most of these parts belong to the holotype or the paratype; we assume that the more complete specimen would have been chosen by Ogloblin as the holotype. Redescription. FEMALE (holotype/paratype). Head, flagellum, and mesosoma dark brown, metasoma brown; scape, pedicel, and legs light brown except metatibia slightly darker. Antenna (Fig. 273) with radicle about 0.25x total length of scape, rest of scape 3.7x as long as wide, longitudinally striate; F1 almost as long as pedicel, as long as F8, and much shorter than F2; F2 and F3 subequal and the longest funicle segments, slightly longer than F4 and F5; F6 and F7 subequal, slightly shorter than F4 or F5; F1 without mps, F2 and F3 each with 1 mps, F4–F8 each with 2 mps; clava with 8 mps, about 3.7x as long as wide. Mesosoma (Fig. 275). Mesoscutum and scutellum almost smooth; propodeum (Fig. 274) with well-developed, subparallel submedian carinae extending to and connecting just below anterior margin of propodeum, and with a transverse rugosity closer to posterior than anterior margin connecting each submedian and lateral carina [not many rugosities in posterior half of propodeum as originally described and erroneously illustrated by Ogloblin (1959b, fig. 13)]. Forewing (Fig. 276) about 3.9x as long as wide; longest marginal seta about 0.25x maximum wing width; disc with a large oval brown spot in apical half (measured from apex of venation) not extending to anterior or posterior margins, bare behind submarginal and marginal veins and setose elsewhere. Petiole about 1.2x as long as wide; gaster just a little longer than mesosoma; ovipositor about 0.9x length of gaster, barely exserted beyond gastral apex; about 1.1x as long as mesotibia. Measurements (µm) of the holotype / paratype. Mesosoma 566; petiole 85; gaster 576; ovipositor 512. Antenna: radicle 33; rest of scape 94; pedicel 36; F1 33; F2 49; F3 49; F4 46; F5 46; F6 42; F7 42; F8 33; clava 142. Forewing 1427:369; longest marginal seta 94. MALE. Unknown. Diagnosis. Gonatocerus (Cosmocomoidea) coxalis is a member of the morrilli subgroup of the ater species group. It is characterized by the following unique combination: propodeum with well-developed, subparallel submedian carinae extending to and connecting just below anterior margin, and with transverse rugosity closer to posterior margin connecting each submedian and lateral carina (Fig. 274); and forewing disc with a large oval brown spot in the apical half (measured from apex of venation) not extending to anterior or posterior margins, and bare behind submarginal and marginal veins (Fig. 276). It may be confused with the undescribed G. (Cosmocomoidea) sp. 3 from the G. (Cosmocomoidea) tuberculifemur (Ogloblin) species complex, known from Argentina, Bolivia, and Brazil (Triapitsyn et al. 2008). Both have an oval brown spot on the forewing disc, but the latter has the petiole wider than long and no rugosity on the propodeum connecting each submedian and lateral carina. Distribution. NEOTROPICAL: Ecuador. Hosts. Unknown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPlanarian Biology and ElectrostimulationFrench-language works237,207