MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6893796606 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4434928

Massive Galaxy Protoclusters in the Early Universe uncovered by the South Pole Telescope

2021· article· en· W6893796606 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalaxyMilky WayPopulationBillion yearsGalaxy clusterStar formationGalaxy formation and evolutionInteracting galaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I will next describe an ambitious survey for early structures forming in the Universe, which represents a key science goal for WFIRST and JWST. The sub-millimeter galaxy (SMG) population represent the most intense stellar nurseries in the Universe, with star formation rates of 200-2000 Msun/yr (compared to the Milky Way’s 1 Msun/yr). They contribute significantly to the buildup of the Universe’s stars. SMGs are ubiquitous in distant, massive galaxy “protoclusters”, the precursors of rich galaxy clusters. As such they can elucidate the formation modes of cluster cores, the assembly of the “Brightest Cluster Galaxies”, and the collapse of the cosmic web over large scales. With the South Pole Telescope, we have uncovered a population of massive protoclusters of galaxies in the early (3<z<7) Universe. WFIRST will identify and characterize many such systems at this early formative assembly phase. I will discuss followup with ALMA, HST, Spitzer, and 8m optical telescopes, and what these structures teach us about galaxy growth and the collapse of large scale structure in an evolving Universe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→