Cladaster analogus Fischer 1940
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cladaster analogus Fisher, 1940 (Fig. 2G, H) Cladaster analogus Fisher, 1940: 123, fig. D, pl. 4, figs 1-3. — Bernasconi 1963: 14. — Clark & Downey 1992: 239. — Clark 1993: 251. MATERIAL EXAMINED. — South Atlantic. Scotia Sea, 53°20’S, 42°42’W, 417-514 m, 29.XI.1986, 1 dry spec., R = 3.5 cm, r = 1.9 cm (NMNH E38569). — Heard Island (near Kerguelen) on rocks, 49°58’75’S, 73°42’04’E, 930 m, III.1983, 1 dry spec., R = 4.2 cm, r = 2.3 cm (MNHN EcAs 11737). DISTRIBUTION. — The South Atlantic off the Falkland Islands, extending to the Scotia Sea and to Heard Island, near Kerguelen. 147- 930 m. DIAGNOSIS. — R/r ≈ 2.0-2.6. Abactinal plates polygonal, ordered. Abactinal, marginal, and actinal plate surfaces covered with enlarged, well-spaced granules. Enlarged granules also forming border around plates. Less than 30 marginal plates from arm tip to arm tip at R = 3.5 cm. Superomarginals abutted at arm tip. Furrow spines two to three, elongate, blunt, round in cross-section.Subambulacral spine blunt, enlarged. Paddle-like pedicellariae present. APOMORPHY LIST. — Nodes 24 to Cladaster analogus: 1.4, granules enlarged; 1.6, granules, enlarged, pointy; 2.3, SM abutted over midline; 3.2, actinal granules enlarged, pointy; 4.2, abradial to furrow spines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".