MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893837588 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4429423

HOW DOES THE KETO BODY TRIM WORK?

2021· article· en· W6893837588 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Contouring and Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrimNoticeWorrySpan (engineering)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

\n\nOffers the purchaser of it the right nicely to do shape also shall make the sexy look stay with the users too keeps the shelf existence of keto body trim lengthy without any issue fastens on a serious notice the metabolisms to melt fat restoration span wished through the body can also be lessen coming down for your appetites shall be seen significantly no worry may be visible absolutely for the muscle groups loss Click here https://apnews.com/press-release/newmediawire/north-america-canada-united-states-dd68a6dd05616ed80fb9cc9ce92df1cc\n\n \n\nhttps://sites.google.com/view/keto-extra-review/\n\nhttps://sites.google.com/view/peace-cbd-oil-benefits/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0740.093

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBody Contouring and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207