Theognete adarmstrongae Anderson 2010, new species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
83. Theognete adarmstrongae Anderson, new species (Figures 252, 269, 286) Diagnosis. Size. Length, male, 3.63mm; female, 3.12mm. Width, male, 2.30mm; female, 2.04mm. As for T. kaulbarsi but sutural interval of elytra not impressed or punctate; posterolateral area of elytra punctate; basal margin of elytra in humeral region not toothed. Tergite VIII in female emarginate in middle. Aedeagus as in Fig. 269. Geographical distribution. México (Chiapas). Natural history. Collected from berlese extraction of mixed oak-pine forest leaf litter at 1550m and dry oak forest litter at 1750m near the base of the upper peak of Cerro Bola. Derivation of specific name. Through their support of the Nature Discovery Fund at the Canadian Museum of Nature, this species is named after Audrey D. Armstrong of Peterborough, Ontario, Canada, as a gift from her husband, Kenneth Armstrong. Material examined. 2♂, 1♀ (CMNC, UNAM) Holotype ♂ (UNAM): MÉXICO: Chiapas. Municipio Villa Corso, Ejido Sierra Morena, R. Biosfera La Sepultura, 16º09’10.6” N, 93º35’25.1” W., 1550m, 17–18.VII.2003, R. Anderson, mixed oak-pine forest litter, 2003-110A / HOLOTYPE ♂, Theognete adarmstrongae sp. nov. R.S. Anderson. Aedeagus extracted. Paratypes: MÉXICO. Chiapas. Municipio Villa Corso, Ejido Sierra Morena, R. Biosfera La Sepultura, 16º09’10.6” N, 93º35’25.1” W., 1550m, 17–18.VII.2003, R. Anderson, mixed oak-pine forest litter, 2003- 110A (1♀ CMNC). Municipio Villa Corso, Sierra Morena, 16.13663º N, 93.59875º W., 1750m, 14.V.2008, M. Branstetter #745 (1♀ CMNC). Chorological relationships. This species is not sympatric with any other species of Theognete.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".