MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893848766 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6125150

Biphallapodema polydentata Papp, 2014, sp. n.

2014· article· en· W6893848766 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeBase (topology)Male genitaliaWingKeel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biphallapodema polydentata sp. n. (Figs 28–38) Type material. Holotype male (HNHM, body in a good quality canada balsam preparation, abdomen and genitalia prepared and kept in a plastic microvial with glycerol): CONGO: Brazzaville, ORSTOM park, J. Balogh & A. Zicsi - soil traps around leaf-compost, No. 211, 18. XI. 1963, 2 days. Paratypes (HNHM): 1 male (abdomen and genitalia prepared and kept in a plastic microvial with glycerol): ibid., S. Endrődy—Younga— 30. XII. 1963, excrement trap, No. 561. 2 males, 1 male 1 female, 2 females, 1 male (complete bodies in canada balsam preparations): same data; 1 male (pinned, abdomen and genitalia prepared and kept in a plastic microvial with glycerol): same data. Description. Measurements in mm: body length 1.21 (holotype), 1.15–1.62 (paratypes); wing length 1.12 (holotype), 1.10–1.32 (paratypes); wing width c. 0.45 (holotype), 0.44–0.51 (paratypes). Male. Sternite 5 (Figs 28–29) with a pair of short blunt medio-caudal emarginations, which bear broad processes of 11–12 long flat pegs each. Synsternite (Fig.30) as described under the genus. Figure 31 is to illustrate the whole epandrial complex with hypandrium and cercal parts and subepandrial sclerite. The fusion of the two halves is ventrally actually more broad, as given on the Figure 32. Surstylus (Fig. 35) with broad blunt apical part (in contrast to B. oligodentata). Basiphallus (Fig. 34) less robust, its epiphallus thicker than in B. oligodentata. Base of postgonite seems less strongly fused to ventral branch of connecting sclerite (Fig. 33), postgonite with a comparatively long sharp anterior apical process, caudal process also sharp in lateral view. Female genitalia with round epiproct, which bears a pair of short thick setae (Fig. 36). Hypoproct (Fig. 37) subtriangular, its medial part more sclerotised, and a larger part than its apical half strongly sclerotised with short hairs, and bears a pair of long thick setae subapically. Cercus long (Fig. 36); with 3 pairs of long apical and subapical setae, apical seta tends to be incurved. Spermathecae (Fig. 38) longer than broad (contrary to B. oligodentata), with a narrowed proximal part, but sclerotised ducts are very similar to the other species with their distal bulb. Etymology. The specific epithet of this new species (‘polydentata’ = numerous teeth) refers to the highnumbered (11–12 each) pegs on the pair of processes on male sternite 5.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207