MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893859213 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6025129

Catocala nilssoni Saldaitis, Pekarsky & Borth, 2017, sp. n.

2017· article· en· W6893859213 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroodGenusDNALarva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Catocala nilssoni sp. n. (Figs 1, 2, 17, 27) Type material. Holotype: male (Fig. 1), China, prov. Liaoning, Da-gu-Shan, Gushan zhen, n. Donggang, 1- 11.vii.2013, leg. Li Jingke, slide No. OP 2901m (coll. PGM, later to be deposited in the HNHM). Paratype: female (Fig. 2), China, Shandong province, Mount Laoshan, 1000 m, Qingdao City, NL 36’20, EL 120’80, 08–24.vii.2007, leg. Li Jingke, slide No. OP 2722f (JB1864f), DNA No. 10255 - 130707 - CH (coll. DNK). Diagnosis. Catocala nilssoni (Figs 1, 2) differs from all other Catocala species and does not appear to belong to any known Catocala species group. Based on a combination of wing pattern and DNA it appears most similar to the C. danilovi-florianii species group and the C. mirifica Butler, 1877 species (Figs 9–16) complex. The new species is the only Palearctic Catocala whose forewings have a broad black patch extending from the inner margin to CU2 and from the antemedial area to the postmedian line. This ground pattern appears in Catocala alabamae Grote, 1875 which has a similar forewing patch in its rare form olivia H. Edwards, 1880 (Fig. 8) which has shown up twice in a reared brood of otherwise nominative C. alabamae (Jeff Slotten pers. com. 2005). This large dark patch also shows up in Catocala minuta Edwards W.H., 1865 (= parvula W. H. Edwards, 1865) and with only two known specimens of C. nilssoni it remains uncertain whether this patch is present in all individuals. In C. mirifica (Figs 9, 10) and Catocala largeteaui Oberthür, 1881 (Figs 11–14) the black area is only in the apical part of the forewings. Catocala nilssoni also differs from C. mirifica and C. largeteaui by the wider and shallower loop formed by its hind wing median band. The new species is significantly larger than C. danilovi (wingspan of 49-56 mm vs. 42–43 mm) (Figs 3, 4) and has forewings with a pale brown background compared to the teal-grey in C. danilovi. The hind wings of C. nilssoni have a broader orange-yellow area as in C. danilovi. New species male genitalia (Fig. 17) differ from those of C. danilovi (Figs 18, 20–23) and C. florianii (Figs19, 20–23) by being more symmetrical (valvae similar in size and in shape), much larger in size with smooth costal margin of valva, larger, elongated harpe and longer, curved aedeagus, whereas genitalia of C. danilovi and C. florianii characterized by smaller size, marked asymmetry (left valva narrower with dentate costal margin, right valva larger with humped costal margin), shorter harpe with concave apex and shorter, almost straight aedeagus. Catocala nilssoni male genitalia differ considerably from those of the C. mirifica species group (Figs 24–26) in size, form and structure of the valvae, harpe, aedeagus and especially the vesical. New species male genitalia considerably larger in size than male genitalia of C. mirifica species group, costal sclerotization of the left valva is wide, its apex acute, harpe tapering with elongated, narrow tips, aedeagus curved, vesica globular, male genitalia of C. mirifica species group valval costa noticeably narrower with digitiform apical extension, tough, thick, bar-like harpe with blind tips, straight aedeagus, irregular shaped vesica with two large, elongated medial diverticula. Female genitalia of the C. nilssoni (Fig. 27) are similar to C. mirifica species group (Figs 28–30) but noticeably larger in size with longer antrum, which is constricted posteriorly, its anterior part with parallel edges, whereas C. mirifica species has shorter antrum with conical anterior part of antrum. Description. Forewing length of holotype male 22 mm, wingspan 49 mm; forewing length of paratype female 26 mm, wingspan 56mm. Head, collar brown-grey, tegulae light grey, abdomen grey with yellow hair-like scales. Grey-brown forewings with mostly indistinct markings other than a broad black patch extending from the antemedial area to the postmedian line and from above the inner margin to CU2 with darker brown shading extending distally from the patch to the outer margin and also at the apex. Faint brown antemedial line forming convex loop above the patch; median line diffused and dark brown from the costal margin to the anterior edge of the two faint concentric circles forming the reniform; postmedial line sharp and black extending obliquely to most distally pointing tooth between veins M1 and M2 becoming pale but still discernible at second most distal tooth between veins M2 and M3 down to inner margin; subterminal line pale and diffuse becoming darker at last two undulations above the margin. Area between postmedial and subterminal lines richer brown distal to the black patch. Hindwings orange-yellow; median black hindwing band forming unconstricted loop from wing base but bulging between veins M2 and CuA1, terminal band broad and even, nearly broken at tornus; prominent orangeyellow apical patch; fringe orange-yellow with black patches at ends of veins. Underside of forewings greyish cream; basal and terminal fields greyish black; postmedian fascia intensive black. Underside of hindwings in basal field yellow; median band not forming visible loop, reaching dorsum; edge of dorsum blackish yellow; subterminal band without full disjunction in tornal edge. Male genitalia (Fig. 17). Uncus relatively short, narrow, evenly curved, apically with fine hook; tegumen elongated; juxta sclerotized, double elongated segments; vinculum with strong saccus; valvae slightly asymmetrical, oval-shaped with acute apex; costal margins heavily sclerotized with upper part slightly serrated. The sclerotization of the costal margin of left valva is wider than on the right valva, and runs along the full length, whereas the sclerotization on the right valve is narrower, present only in proximal part and reaches roughly the middle of the valva. Harpe large and wide at the base, tapering with an elongated, evenly curved apical part; aedeagus strongly sclerotized, elongated, cylindrical, curved; caecum elongated; carinal plate massive, strong, evenly curved; vesica membranous, main part globular, multidiverticulate, distal tube long. Female genitalia (Fig. 27). Ovipositor large, elongated, relatively narrow; papilla analis elongated, broadly rounded at apex and oval shaped, hairy with thin, short seta; apophyses posteriors strong, long; apophyses anteriores shorter than apophyses posteriores; ostium bursae as wide as antrum; antrum long, heavily sclerotized, cylindrical with parallel margins, constricted posteriorly; ductus bursae short, heavily sclerotized, tapering; corpus bursae membranous with cylindrical upper part and globular main part. Molecular analysis. DNA barcoding results based on percentage differences with one specimen of C. nilssoni appear consistent with the morphology. Full length 658 base pair sequences of the Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit 5' Region (CO1–5P) gene were prepared by the University of Guelph's Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD) by methods described in Hebert et al. (2003). Molecular variation based on the Kimura two-parameter distance model for COI DNA barcodes between a single specimen of C. nilssoni follow: two C. danilovi 3.94%; two C. florianii at least 4.11%; six Catocala largeteaui yunnana (Mell, 1936) at least 3.97%; nine C. largeteaui 4.42%; two C. mirifica at least 4.75%. The specimen of C.nilssoni had the following sequence for COI 5‘positions 1 to 658: AACTTTATATTTTATTTTTGGGATTTGAGCAGGAATAGTAGGAACTTCATTAAGATTATT AATTCGAGCTGAATTAGGTAATCCTGGATCTTTAATTGGAGATGATCAAATTTATAATAC TATTGTTACAGCTCATGCTTTTATTATAATTTTTTTTATAGTTATACCAATTATAATTGG AGGATTTGGTAATTGATTAGTACCTTTAATATTAGGAGCTCCTGATATAGCTTTCCCTCG TATAAATAATATAAGTTTTTGACTTCTACCCCCCTCATTAACTTTACTAATTTCGAGAAG AATTGTAGAAAACGGAGCAGGAACTGGATGAACAGTTTATCCCCCCCTTTCTTCTAACAT TGCTCATAGAGGAAGTTCAGTAGATTTAGCTATTTTTTCTTTACACTTAGCTGGAATTTC ATCAATTCTAGGAGCTATTAACTTTATTACTACAATTATTAATATACGATTAAATAATTT AATATTTGATCAAATACCTTTATTTGTTTGAGCTGTAGGAATTACTGCATTCCTTCTTCT TCTTTCATTACCAGTATTAGCCGGAGCTATTACTATACTTTTAACTGATCGAAATTTAAA TACTTCTTTTTTTGACCCTGCTGGAGGAGGAGATCCTATTTTATATCAACATTTATTT Biology and distribution. Both specimens of C. nilssoni were collected in July at light in the mountains of northeast China. In 2007 in Shandong Province a female was found at an elevation of 1000 meters on Mount Lao and in 2013 a male was collected in Liaoning Province in the Da-gu Mountains. Etymology. The new species is named after Danny Nilsson (Kalvehave, Denmark) for his obsession with entomology and providing the first specimen for our study. Remarks. While the new species clearly differs from the C. mirifica species group it is noted that the C. mirifica species group remains largely unresolved. We sequenced 18 individuals from this group obtaining 8 different haplotypes within 5 groups with sequences varying by no more than one base pair. Catocala largeteaui differs in COI from the C. mirifica by only 0.62% and was hypothesized by Ishizuka (1982) to be a subspecies of C. mirifica. A greater 3.3% COI variation occurs between C. largeteaui and its subspecies, C. largeteaui yunnana (Figs 15, 16, 26, 30) which has a uniformly dark forewing unlike the pale forewing with contrasting dark apical region of C. largeteaui (Figs 11–14). While little variation was observed in the female genitalia some potential male genitalia differences in the anterior rosette of the vesica exist between C. largeteaui and its subspecies but more dissections of sequenced specimens are needed to confirm these differences and better determine how many valid species are present in the mirifica group. Catocala danilovi (Figs 3, 4, 18, 20–23) and C. florianii (Figs 5–7, 19, 20–23) do have male genitalia differences but not those diagnosed in the original C. florianii description. When C. florianii was described in 2008 authors Saldaitis & Ivinskis, lacking specimens of C. danilovi, used C. danilovi male genitalia figures from Park et al. 2006 for their diagnosis. Upon the authors obtaining and dissecting a C. danilovi male specim

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSpider Taxonomy and Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207