Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cybaeus tardatus (Chamberlin) Figs 46–51, 60, 62 Parauximus tardatus Chamberlin 1919: 3, fig. 2. Namopsilus pletus Chamberlin 1919: 14, fig. 1. Cybaeus tardatus Chamberlin 1924: 669. Chamberlin and Ivie 1932: 23, fig. 56. Chamberlin and Ivie 1937: 225. Roewer 1954: 92. Bonnet 1956: 1304. Roth and Brown 1986: 4, 12. World Spider Catalog 2021. Type material. U.S.A.: California: Holotype male. Los Angeles County, Claremont, no date, R.V. Chamberlin (MCZ), examined. Holotype female of Namopsilus pletus. Los Angeles County, Claremont, iv.1913, R.V. Chamberlin (MCZ), examined. Other material examined. U.S.A.: California: Los Angeles. 1♂, Claremont, no date, no collector (MCZ); 1♀ Pasadena, vi.1945, S.C. Bishop (AMNH). Diagnosis. The male of C. tardatus is readily diagnosed by the form of the proximal and distal arms of the tegular apophysis (Figs 48, 60); these characteristics are discussed under the diagnosis of C. piazzai spec. nov. Distinguishing the females of C. orarius spec. nov. and C. tardatus is discussed under the diagnosis of the former. From the other females in the tardatus species group with rounded spermathecal bases (C. piazzai spec. nov., C. topanga spec. nov.) the female of C. tardatus is distinguished by the nearly parallel-sided atrial area, the copulatory ducts contiguous over much of their length, as well as the general simplicity of the vulval ducts (Figs 50–51) (versus atrial area inverted vase-shaped with sides diverging posteriorly [Figs 42, 52–53], copulatory ducts non-contiguous [Fig. 43] or contiguous only along anterior-most section [Figs 42, 54], and vulval ducts complex [Figs 42–43, 45, 53–54] in C. piazzai spec. nov. and C. topanga spec. nov.). Description. Ventral tibia I macrosetae: 2-1p-2-1p-2. Femora and tibia lightly banded. Male: (n=2). About 40 peg setae on strongly anteriorly directed patellar apophysis (Fig. 47). Retrolateral tibial apophysis about 2/3 the length of the tibia, not extending to anterior margin of tibia (Fig. 46). Measurements (n=2). CL 3.2, 3.3; CW 2.50, 2.50; SL 1.55, 1.53; SW 1.48, 1.48. Holotype listed first. Female: (n=2). Atrium (Fig. 50) with area between atrial openings slightly raised and convex, largely parallelsided but slightly widening posteriorly. Vulva (Figs 50–51) with copulatory ducts opening into atria from midline of vulva, well sclerotized posteriorly, less so anteriorly; heads of spermathecae undifferentiated from adjacent ducts (i.e. not distinct lobes), located near posterior margin of vulva, visible in dorsal view; spermathecal stalks short, thick walled; Bennett’s glands visible in dorsal view on small, thick walled, rounded spermathecal bases. Measurements (n=2). CL 2.9, 3.3; CW 2.03, 2.38; SL 1.33, 1.48; SW 1.30, 1.48. Holotype of N. pletus listed second. Distribution. (Fig. 62). Los Angeles County, California. Male specimens listed in Chamberlin and Ivie (1932) from Ensenada, Baja California have not been found. We consider Ensenada to be outside the range of C. tardatus and have not included that locality in the distribution map.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".