Bibliographic record
Abstract
O. cincta (Linnaeus, 1758) – Podura cincta Linnaeus, 1758: 609 NT Scott 1963b; Skidmore 1995 BC Skidmore 1995; Cannings 2010 MB Aitchison 1979 as cincta var. vaga; Skidmore 1995; Lindo 2014 ON Scott 1963b; Skidmore 1995 NS Tullberg 1877; Stach 1966; Fox 1967; Christiansen & Bellinger 1980, 1998; Skidmore 1995 NF Folsom 1919a; Scott 1963b; Stach 1966; Skidmore 1995; Arulnayagam 1995; Puvanendran et al. 1997 Remarks: “This is probably an introduced species which is well established only in the north-eastern United States and Canada ” (Christiansen & Bellinger 1980, p. 809). General distribution: Northeastern Nearctic and Palaearctic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".