Stiphrosoma humerale Rohacek & Barber 2005
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stiphrosoma humerale Roháček & Barber, 2005 (Figs 25–28) Stiphrosoma humerale Roháček & Barber, 2005: 89; Roháček, 2006: 287; Roháček, 2009: 102. Description. Head (Figs 25, 27) mostly yellow except for dark brown frontal triangle, and most of occiput and mesonotum brown to dark brown except for whitish yellow humerus and yellow notopleuron, abdomen brown (Figs 25, 27). Antennal 1st flagellomere with long white cilia on apex and arista shortly pectinate.Fore femora (Figs 25, 27) with a ctenidial spine being markedly longer than maximum width of tibiae. Anepisternum with a brown transverse stripe on upper margin (Figs 25, 27). Male genitalia (Fig. 28): epandrium with 2 dorsomedial pairs of longer and thicker setae in posterior view, gonostylus short and markedly broad, particularly in apical third in lateral view (Roháček, 2006: figs 608‒609); pregonite with numerous longer and thicker setae (Roháček, 2006: fig. 610); filum of distiphallus curved apex with shape like a triangle (Roháček, 2006: fig. 613). Female tergosternum 7 dorsally short and dark but dorsomedially divided (Roháček, 2006: fig. 618); internal structures of genital chamber (Roháček, 2006: figs 617, 619) complex and well sclerotized, with 3 pairs of partly fused sclerites; spermathecae (Fig. 26) with spines transversely attached to surface denser (Roháček, 2006: fig. 616). Material examined. 1♂ (IMAU), China, Inner Mongolia, Hulunbeir, Genhe City, Hanma National Nature Reserve, Niuer Lake, shrubs, 5.VII.2017, Shunde Li; 1♀ (IMAU), China, Inner Mongolia, Hulunbeir, Genhe City, Hanma National Nature Reserve, Jinamijima River, wetland, 28.VII.2016, Sample II, Li Shi. Distribution. China (Inner Mongolia), Czech Republic, Latvia, North Korea, Russia, USA, Canada. Remarks. The species is reported in China for the first time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".