MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893871894 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5910940

Quedius (Raphirus) zetes, sp. nov.

2012· article· en· W6893871894 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumOblique caseHolotypeMargin (machine learning)Head (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quedius (Raphirus) zetes sp. nov. (Figs. 69–76) Type locality. People’s Republic of China, Sichuan, Xiangcheng 2700m 29°00N 99°46E. Type material. Holotype (male) and allotype (female): China: CHINA Sichuan Xiangcheng 2700m 29°00N 99°46E 29.VI. 1996 [C46] /collected by A. Smetana, J. Farkač and P. Kabátek. In the Smetana collection, Ottawa, Canada (to be eventually deposited at the Muséum d’histoire naturelle, Genève, Switzerland). Paratypes: China: [Sichuan]: same data as holotype, 5 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀ (ASC, MSC). Description. Black, head, pronotum and elytra with slight metallic lustre, elytra piceous in some specimens, abdomen markedly iridescent. Palpi, antennae and legs pale testaceous, medial faces of hind tibiae darkened. Head rounded, wider than long (ratio 1.13); eyes very large and convex, tempora quite short, considerably shorter than length of eyes seen from above (ratio 0.15); no additional setiferous punctures between anterior frontal punctures; posterior frontal puncture touching posteriomedial margin of eye, one puncture between it and posterior margin of head; temporal puncture touching posterior margin of eye; surface of head with dense, fine microsculpture of transverse and oblique waves, becoming submeshed on clypeus. Antenna moderately long, segments 2 and 3 subequal in length, segments 4–6 longer than wide, becoming gradually shorter, segment 7 vaguely longer than wide, segments 8–10 about as long as wide, last segment as long as two preceding segments combined. Pronotum about as long as wide, broadly arcuate basally, evenly transversely convex, vaguely narrowed anteriad; dorsal rows each with three punctures; sublateral rows each with one or two punctures, with posterior puncture situated before level of large lateral puncture; surface of pronotum with microsculpture similar to that on head, but vaguely finer and denser. Scutellum with microsculpture of rudimentary waves, except for basal third punctate and golden-yellowish pubescent. Elytra relatively long, at suture as long as, at sides somewhat (ratio 1.18) longer than pronotum at midline; punctation moderately coarse, very dense, transverse interspaces between punctures mostly as large as diameters of punctures; surface between punctures without microsculpture; pubescence yellowish-golden. Wings fully developed. Abdomen with tergite 7 (fifth visible) with distinct whitish apical seam of palisade setae; tergite 2 (in front of first fully visible tergite) with a few very fine, scattered punctures; first two visible tergites each with inconspicuous impression at each side; punctation of tergites considerably finer than that on elytra, moderately dense, but becoming markedly sparser toward apical margin of each tergite, and in general toward apex of abdomen; pubescence piceous on middle portion of each tergite, but becoming golden-yellowish toward lateral portion of each tergite, without forming appreciable patches of denser hairs there; surface between punctures with excessively fine and dense microsculpture of striae. M a l e. First four segments of front tarsus markedly dilated, sub-bilobed, each densely covered by tenent setae ventrally, segment 2 slightly wider than apex of tibia (ratio 1.14), segment 4 narrower than preceding segments. Sternite 8 with two long setae on each side, with moderately deep and wide medioapical emargination (Fig. 69), small triangular area before emargination flattened and smooth. Genital segment with tergite 10 narrowly triangular, arcuate apically, with several longer setae at and near apical margin, otherwise sparingly setose (Fig. 70); sternite 9 with moderately wide, long basal portion, apical portion with slightly differentiated subapical seta at each side before arcuate apex, otherwise sparingly setose (Fig. 71). Aedoeagus (Figs. 72–75) moderately narrow and elongate, median lobe parallelsided, anteriorly narrowed into short apical portion with acute apex, on face adjacent to paramere, when paramere removed, with minute medial carina below apex, appearing as minute dent in lateral view (Figs 73, 74); paramere large, broadly fusiform, with narrowly arcuate apex not quite reaching apex of median lobe; four setae at apical margin, medial pair conspicuously long, lateral pair fine, two setae similar to lateral pair of apical setae at each lateral margin below apex (Fig. 75); sensory peg setae on underside of paramere quite numerous, forming a long, rather wide, irregular longitudinal row along each lateral margin of apical portion of paramere (Fig. 75). F e m a l e. First four segments of front tarsus not appreciably dilated. Tergite 10 of genital segment relatively narrow, with narrowly arcuate apex, with several long setae at and near apical portion, otherwise with only a few setae (Fig. 76). Length 4.0– 4.5 mm. Geographical distribution. Quedius zetes is at present known only from the type locality in western Sichuan. Bionomics. The specimens of the original series were taken by sifting wet moss, leaf litter and other debris under dense bushes growing in small seepages at the base of an escarpment along a river. Recognition and comments. Quedius zetes is in all characters very similar to Q. meilixue. It differs from it mainly by the pronotum which is dark in both sexes, by the differently shaped aedoeagus (Figs. 65, 72), and by the conspicuously long medial pair of apical setae on the paramere (Fig. 75). Etymology. The specific epithet is the name of Zetes, - is, m, the son of Boreas, one of the Argonauts, in apposition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.135 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207