MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893885078 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4673001

Meriola decepta Banks

2021· article· en· W6893885078 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeGenusSingle specimenFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meriola decepta Banks Figs 25–27, 90 Meriola decepta Banks, 1895: 81 (nine female syntypes from Sea Cliff, Long Island, Nassau County, New York, in MCZ, examined by Platnick & Shadab, 1974); Gertsch & Davis, 1940: 11; Muma, 1943: 121, pl. XV, fig. 5. Trachelas deceptus Simon, 1897: 180; Roewer, 1955: 589; Bonnet, 1959: 4667. Trachelas parvulus Banks, 1898: 225, pl. 13, fig. 28 (female holotype from Mexico, no specific locality, in CAS, destroyed); Roewer, 1955: 588. Bonnet, 1959: 4670. Meriola inornata Banks, 1901: 574, fig. 6 (female holotype from Albuquerque, Bernalillo County, New Mexico, in MCZ, examined by Platnick & Shadab, 1974). Trachelas inornatus Petrunkevitch, 1911: 523; Roewer, 1955: 589; Bonnet, 1959: 4668. Meriola decepta floridana Chamberlin & Ivie, 1935: 40, pl. 13, fig. 107 (male holotype from Dunedin, Pinellas County, Florida, in the University of Utah, lost); Chamberlin & Ivie, 1944: 185. Trachelas deceptus floridanus Roewer, 1955: 589. Trachelas decepta Platnick & Shadab, 1974: 29, figs 39, 103–106; Dondale & Redner, 1982: 127, figs 234–236; Breene et al., 1993: 85, fig. 96A–B. Meriola decepta Platnick & Ewing, 1995: 8. Diagnosis. Males (Figs 26–27) resemble those of M. arcifera and M. peras sp. nov. by the elongate abdomen and the oval shape of the bulb. They differ from both by the small, rounded RTA. Meriola decepta males also differ from both species by lacking dark rings on the legs. Females (Fig. 25) resemble those of M. peras sp. nov. by the absence of an epigynal hood, with a wide median field, and by having large, almost contiguous S2, but differ by the shorter, not arc-shaped epigynal lateral ridges. Description. See Dondale & Redner (1982) for male and female descriptions. Natural history and habitat. Several specimens were found in leaf litter in gardens and houses. Distribution. Known from Canada, U.S.A., Mexico, Guatemala, Peru and Brazil. New records. CANADA: Labrador: N 52.939001°, W 66.914216°, 2 females (NMHN 01561). U.S.A.: Texas: Edinburg, N 26.301737°, W 98.163343°, 4.XII.1934, S. Mulaik, 1 female, 1 male (NMHN 01561). Travis Co.: U. T. Brackenridge Fieldlab, N 30.284310°, W 97.778248°, 23.VI.1972, B. Vogel, 1 female (NMHN 01561). Florida: Polk Co.: Lake Alfred, N 28.091963°, W 81.723411°, 27.V.1970, M. Muma & H. Greene, 1 female, 1 male (MCN 22460). Arizona: Yuma, in garden, N 32.692651°, W 114.627692°, 30.VI.1957, V. Roth, 5 females, 4 males (CAS, CASENT 9059149). California: Indio, N 33.720577°, W 116.215561°, 17.XII.1932, F. Stickney, 4 females (NMHN 01566). Same locality, 9.XI.1933, on decaying date palm tissue, F. Stickney, 1 female (NMHN 01566). Same locality, 24.V.1934, in rotting dates on ground, F. Stickney, 1 female (NMHN 01566). Orange Co.: Anaheim, N 33.835293°, W 117.914504°, 21.IX.2001, J. Bradley, 1 male (CAS, CASENT 9059145). Riverside, N 33.953349°, W 117.396156°, 16.IV.1975, collector unknown, 1 female (NMHN 01561). Same locality, 28.V.1975, collector unknown, 1 male (NMHN 01561). Same locality, 27.V.1976, citrus litter, collector unknown, 3 females, 2 males (NMHN 01561). Los Angeles Co.: Covina home backyard, N 34.090009°, W 117.890340°, 21.V.1961, P. Craig, 1 male (CAS, CASENT 9059482). Charles Co.: Blossom Point, N 38.416667°, W 77.100000°, 18.X.1995, W. Steiner & W. Reynolds, 1 male (NMHN 01566). Missouri: Johnson Co.: Warrensburg, in house, N 38.762789°, W 93.736050°, VI.1962, W. Peck, 1 female (CAS, CASENT 9059213). Indiana: N 40.267194°, W 86.134902°, Marx collection, 2 females (NMHN 01561). Massachusetts: Nantucket Co.: Polpis, N 41.298687°, W 70.013189°, 19.IX.1976, cranberry bog, J. Coddington, 1 male (NMHN 01561). Barnstable Co.: Falmouth, N 41.553225°, W 70.608577°, 31.XII.1990, litter near pond, R. Edwards, 6 females (NMHN 01561). Barnstable Co.: Hatchville, Frances A. Crane Wildlife Management Area, N 41.616282°, W 70.547317°, 15.VI.1988, R. Edwards, 1 female (NMHN 01561). Barnstable Co.: Quisset, N 41.661619°, W 70.325443°, 4.V.1989, salt pond, detritus, R. Edwards, 6 females (NMHN 01561). PERÚ: Ica: Pisco, N 13.979386°, W 76.178374°, VIII.2008, A. Aparicio, 2 females (MACN-Ar 30560). BRAZIL: Sergipe: Campus Universitário São Cristovão, S 10.925252°, W 37.098997°, 18.IX.1982, H. Araujo, 1 male (MCN 21071). Paraná: Maringá: Iguatemi, S 23.371159°, W 52.065115°, 27.VII.1980, A. Geahl, 1 female (MCN 12262). Rio Grande do Sul: Canela, S 29.356493°, W 50.812426°, 20.III.1976, A. Lise, 1 male (MCN 3980). Montenegro: Centro Experimental da Ulbra (CEULBRA), S 29.795556°, W 51.387500°, 31.VIII.2008, A. Brendel, 1 female (MCN 44904). Triunfo, S 29.935623°, W 51.712418°, 12.IV.1981, M. Galileo, 1 male (MCN 9702).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207